The State of Maharashtra vs Kiran Prabhakar Kedare Advocate - Malviya Rajendra F — 3/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHJG210000722022

Filing Number

60/2022

Filing Date

10-Jan-2022

Registration No

3/2022

Registration Date

10-Jan-2022

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Yawal

Judge

2-Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

159

Police Station

Faizpur Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498,323,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kiran Prabhakar Kedare Advocate - Malviya Rajendra F

  2. 2.Kalpana Prabhakr Kedare

  3. 3.Dhiraj Surajlal Sarjare

  4. 4.Rekha Dhiraj Sarjare

  5. 5.Yogesh Prakash Pimpale

  6. 6.Kavita Yogesh Pimpale

  7. 7.Mirabai Digambar Pimpale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary Case 3/2022 - State of Maharashtra v. Kiran Prabhakar Kedare & Others The court acquitted all seven accused of charges under IPC sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (insulting modesty), and 506 (criminal intimidation) with section 34 (common intention). The complainant alleged that the accused demanded ₹5 lakhs from her for a car after marriage, and when she couldn't provide it, subjected her to physical and mental harassment. However, the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Both prosecution witnesses testified inconsistently—the complainant herself denied suffering harassment and stated the family dispute was settled outside court, while the second witness similarly denied the allegations. The court found insufficient evidence of the requisite cruel acts and threats required under section 498-A, leading to acquittal of all accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  11. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  13. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  14. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  15. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  16. 17-May-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  17. 19-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  18. 01-Feb-2025

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  19. 04-Dec-2024

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  20. 16-Oct-2024

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  21. 14-Aug-2024

    Charge

    Cjjd and JMFC Yawal

  22. 10-Jul-2024

    Charge

    Cjjd and JMFC Yawal

  23. 12-Jun-2024

    Charge

    Cjjd and JMFC Yawal

  24. 20-Mar-2024

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  25. 20-Dec-2023

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  26. 22-Nov-2023

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  27. 18-Oct-2023

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  28. 16-Aug-2023

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  29. 12-Jul-2023

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  30. 14-Jun-2023

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  31. 03-May-2023

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  32. 26-Apr-2023

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  33. 01-Feb-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  34. 28-Dec-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  35. 21-Dec-2022

    Order

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  36. 07-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  37. 16-Nov-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  38. 10-Oct-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  39. 05-Sep-2022

    N.B.W._Ready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  40. 25-Jul-2022

    Charge

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  41. 08-Jun-2022

    Appearance

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  42. 18-May-2022

    Appearance

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  43. 22-Feb-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Yawal

  44. 11-Jan-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 10-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case 3/2022 - State of Maharashtra v. Kiran Prabhakar Kedare & Others The court acquitted all seven accused of charges under IPC sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (insulting modesty), and 506 (criminal intimidation) with section 34 (common intention). The complainant alleged that the accused demanded ₹5 lakhs from her for a car after marriage, and when she couldn't provide it, subjected her to physical and mental harassment. However, the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Both prosecution witnesses testified inconsistently—the complainant herself denied suffering harassment and stated the family dispute was settled outside court, while the second witness similarly denied the allegations. The court found insufficient evidence of the requisite cruel acts and threats required under section 498-A, leading to acquittal of all accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case