R P F Bhusawal Loco vs Rahul Ratan More - etc 17 Advocate - Yadav Rakesh M — 125/2024

Case under Railway Property(unlawful Possession) Act 1966 Section 3-a. Status: Evidence Before Charge. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Evidence Before Charge Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHJG110051052024

Filing Number

5105/2024

Filing Date

30-May-2024

Registration No

125/2024

Registration Date

30-May-2024

Court

Railway Court, Bhusawal

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

08

Police Station

R P F Bhusawal Loco

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Railway Property(unlawful Possession) Act 1966 Section 3-a

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R P F Bhusawal Loco

    Adv. Ajay Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rahul Ratan More - etc 17 Advocate - Yadav Rakesh M

  2. 2.Sachin Uttam Tayade

    Adv. Yadav Rakesh M

  3. 3.Shashikant Ganapat Surwade

    Adv. Yadav Rakesh M

  4. 4.Kunal Laxman More

    Adv. Yadav Rakesh M

  5. 5.Sunil Bhaulal Potadar

    Adv. Sewlani Manish P

  6. 6.Ashwini Charansinh Yadav

  7. 7.Jakir Khan Hamid Khan

  8. 8.Harshal Pradip Patil

    Adv. Yadav Rakesh M

  9. 9.Iqabal Liyakat Ali

    Adv. Yadav Rakesh M

  10. 10.Saiyad Sher Ali Liyakat Ali

  11. 11.Supadu Ramjan Pinjari

    Adv. Lokhande Darshan K

  12. 12.Umesh Rajendra Dhanagar

    Adv. Yadav Rakesh M

  13. 13.Mangesh Rajendra Dhanagar

    Adv. Yadav Rakesh M

  14. 14.Dhanraj Sudhakar Ambhore

    Adv. Shaikh Ismail Babad

  15. 15.Yunus Rajjak Shaikh

    Adv. Shaikh Ismail Babad

  16. 16.Shaikh Wasim Shaikh Kabir

  17. 17.Shaikh Tanwir Shaikh Kabir

  18. 18.Javid Khan Hamid Khan

    Adv. Shaikh Ismail Babad

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jul-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  3. 25-Jun-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  5. 30-May-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  6. 18-May-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  7. 13-Apr-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  11. 14-Feb-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  12. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  13. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  14. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  16. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  17. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  18. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  19. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  20. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  21. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  22. 11-Jun-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  23. 11-Apr-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  24. 06-Mar-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  25. 28-Feb-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  26. 20-Feb-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 125/2024 Summary: The application for return of a seized Goods Carrier vehicle (registration MH-04/GF-1225) was allowed. The court directed R.P.F. Bhusawal Loco to release the vehicle to applicant Harshal Pradip Patil upon execution of a Rs. 3,00,000 bond (Supurtnama), with conditions that the applicant cannot sell or modify the vehicle without court permission and must produce it as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 20-Feb-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  28. 12-Feb-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  29. 21-Jan-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  30. 27-Dec-2024

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  31. 24-Oct-2024

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  32. 17-Oct-2024

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  33. 26-Sep-2024

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  34. 05-Sep-2024

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  35. 13-Aug-2024

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  36. 08-Aug-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  37. 08-Aug-2024

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  38. 06-Aug-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  39. 06-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  40. 05-Aug-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  41. 05-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  42. 01-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  43. 27-Jun-2024

    Reply Unready

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  44. 14-Jun-2024

    Reply Unready

    Judicial Magistrate F C Rly.Bhusawal

  45. 30-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 30-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 125/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 125/2024 Summary: The application for return of a seized Goods Carrier vehicle (registration MH-04/GF-1225) was allowed. The court directed R.P.F. Bhusawal Loco to release the vehicle to applicant Harshal Pradip Patil upon execution of a Rs. 3,00,000 bond (Supurtnama), with conditions that the applicant cannot sell or modify the vehicle without court permission and must produce it as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case