Pradip Antaram Karanjekar vs M.S.R.T.C.,through its Divisional Controller, Bhandara and 01 Advocate - P. M. Nichakawade — 109/2019

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Chief and cross of Respondent. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Chief and cross of Respondent Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Complaint

CNR: MHIC360002382019

Filing Number

238/2019

Filing Date

20-Dec-2019

Registration No

109/2019

Registration Date

20-Dec-2019

Court

Member, Industrial Court, Bhandara

Judge

1-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pradip Antaram Karanjekar

    Adv. S.E.Reghorte

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.S.R.T.C.,through its Divisional Controller, Bhandara and 01 Advocate - P. M. Nichakawade

  2. 2.M.S.R.T.C., through its Divisional Traffic Officer, Bhandara

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Chief and cross of Respondent

    Member

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Chief and cross of Respondent

    Member

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Member

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Member

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Member

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Member

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Member

  9. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Member

  10. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  11. 06-Dec-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Bhandara Bench) - Complaint (ULP) No. 109/2019 The court declared that while the departmental enquiry against driver Pradip Antaram Karanjekar was fair and conducted according to natural justice principles, the enquiry officer's findings were perverse and not supported by adequate evidence. The officer withheld three annual increments based on allegations of abusing superiors and making threats, but the court found no specific abusive words or credible threat-to-kill evidence in the witness statements, with only interested witnesses examined and no corroboration from independent sources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  13. 05-Dec-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  14. 07-Nov-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  15. 17-Oct-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  16. 03-Oct-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  17. 19-Sep-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  18. 12-Sep-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  19. 30-Aug-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  20. 21-Aug-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  21. 08-Aug-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  22. 31-Jul-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  23. 18-Jul-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  24. 11-Jul-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  25. 04-Jul-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  26. 20-Jun-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  27. 25-Apr-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  28. 28-Mar-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  29. 21-Feb-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  30. 31-Jan-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  31. 10-Jan-2025

    Hearing on Priliminary Issues

    Member

  32. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  33. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  34. 23-Oct-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  35. 23-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  36. 14-Oct-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  37. 11-Oct-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  38. 04-Oct-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  39. 27-Sep-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  40. 09-Aug-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  41. 28-Jun-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  42. 03-May-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  43. 05-Apr-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  44. 15-Mar-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  45. 02-Mar-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  46. 16-Feb-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  47. 20-Jan-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  48. 05-Jan-2024

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  49. 01-Dec-2023

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  50. 27-Oct-2023

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  51. 29-Sep-2023

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  52. 19-Aug-2023

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  53. 21-Jul-2023

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  54. 23-Jun-2023

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  55. 06-May-2023

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  56. 01-Apr-2023

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  57. 10-Mar-2023

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  58. 10-Feb-2023

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  59. 07-Jan-2023

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  60. 16-Dec-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  61. 05-Nov-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  62. 07-Oct-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  63. 03-Sep-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  64. 05-Aug-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  65. 15-Jul-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  66. 24-Jun-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  67. 10-Jun-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  68. 22-Apr-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  69. 01-Apr-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  70. 17-Mar-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  71. 18-Feb-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  72. 28-Jan-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  73. 07-Jan-2022

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  74. 17-Dec-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  75. 19-Nov-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  76. 29-Oct-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  77. 08-Oct-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  78. 17-Sep-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  79. 03-Sep-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  80. 13-Aug-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  81. 09-Jul-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  82. 11-Jun-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  83. 16-Apr-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  84. 26-Mar-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  85. 05-Mar-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  86. 12-Feb-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  87. 08-Jan-2021

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  88. 11-Dec-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  89. 20-Nov-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  90. 16-Oct-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  91. 18-Sep-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  92. 04-Sep-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  93. 14-Aug-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  94. 17-Jul-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  95. 19-Jun-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  96. 22-May-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  97. 24-Apr-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  98. 03-Apr-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  99. 20-Mar-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  100. 06-Mar-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  101. 15-Feb-2020

    Hearing on interim relief

    Member

  102. 31-Jan-2020

    Hearing below Exh._____

    Member

  103. 17-Jan-2020

    Reply

    Member

  104. 20-Dec-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  105. 20-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 109/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Bhandara Bench) - Complaint (ULP) No. 109/2019 The court declared that while the departmental enquiry against driver Pradip Antaram Karanjekar was fair and conducted according to natural justice principles, the enquiry officer's findings were perverse and not supported by adequate evidence. The officer withheld three annual increments based on allegations of abusing superiors and making threats, but the court found no specific abusive words or credible threat-to-kill evidence in the witness statements, with only interested witnesses examined and no corroboration from independent sources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case