Durga Sohan Shendre vs State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, and Other Advocate - R.V.Bhanarkar — 63/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Reply. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Complaint
CNR: MHIC360001232025
Filing Number
163/2025
Filing Date
09-Dec-2025
Registration No
63/2025
Registration Date
09-Dec-2025
Court
Member, Industrial Court, Bhandara
Judge
1-Member
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Durga Sohan Shendre
Adv. V.A.Bhoyar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, and Other Advocate - R.V.Bhanarkar
-
2.Civil Surgeon, General Hospital Bhandara,
-
3.Medical Officer Class-I Subhaschandra Bose Government Sub-District Hospital Tumsar,
-
4.Swami Vivekanand Swaym Rojgar Seva Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Gondia
Adv. M.B.Bahadure
Case History
-
27-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Reply
Member
-
06-Feb-2026
Reply
Member
-
23-Jan-2026
Reply
Member
-
06-Jan-2026
Reply
Member
-
09-Dec-2025
Order on T.I.View PDF
Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Bhandara Bench) granted ad-interim relief in a ULP complaint filed by Durga Sohan Shendre against the State of Maharashtra's Public Health Department. The court ordered respondents to continue the complainant's service and refrain from passing any adverse order until the next hearing. The case has been adjourned to 06/01/2026, and respondents must be served notice by all modes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 63/2025
Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Bhandara Bench) granted ad-interim relief in a ULP complaint filed by Durga Sohan Shendre against the State of Maharashtra's Public Health Department. The court ordered respondents to continue the complainant's service and refrain from passing any adverse order until the next hearing. The case has been adjourned to 06/01/2026, and respondents must be served notice by all modes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts