Dharmapal Baliram Wasnik vs State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, and other Advocate - R.V.Bhanarkar — 59/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Reply. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Complaint
CNR: MHIC360001192025
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
159/2025
Filing Date
09-12-2025
Registration No
59/2025
Registration Date
09-12-2025
Court
Member, Industrial Court, Bhandara
Judge
1-MEMBER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dharmapal Baliram Wasnik
Adv. V.A.Bhoyar
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, and other Advocate - R.V.Bhanarkar
Civil Surgeon, General Hospital Bhandara,
Medical Officer Class-I Subhaschandra Bose Government Sub-District Hospital Tumsar,
Swami Vivekanand Swaym Rojgar Seva Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Gondia
Adv. M.B.Bahadure
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER
Reply
Reply
Reply
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Reply |
| 23-01-2026 | Reply |
| 06-01-2026 | Reply |
| 09-12-2025 | First Order |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Bhandara Bench) granted ad-interim relief in Complaint (ULP) No. 59/2025 on December 9, 2025. The complainant, Dharmapal Baliram Wasnik, who was appointed in 2015 by the State of Maharashtra's Public Health Department, sought protection against potential termination during the pendency of his case claiming permanent employment status. The court ordered the respondents to continue the complainant's service and refrain from passing any adverse orders until the next hearing scheduled for January 6, 2026, and directed service of notice on all respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Bhandara Bench) granted ad-interim relief in Complaint (ULP) No. 59/2025 on December 9, 2025. The complainant, Dharmapal Baliram Wasnik, who was appointed in 2015 by the State of Maharashtra's Public Health Department, sought protection against potential termination during the pendency of his case claiming permanent employment status. The court ordered the respondents to continue the complainant's service and refrain from passing any adverse orders until the next hearing scheduled for January 6, 2026, and directed service of notice on all respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts