Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Indurkha and other vs Pralhad Totoba Pudke and other Advocate - T.S.Singade — 23/2025

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 44. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Revision ULP - Revn.AppULP

CNR: MHIC360001002025

Filing Number

136/2025

Filing Date

27-Oct-2025

Registration No

23/2025

Registration Date

27-Oct-2025

Court

Member, Industrial Court, Bhandara

Judge

1-Member

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 44

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Indurkha and other

    Adv. V.A.Bhoyar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pralhad Totoba Pudke and other Advocate - T.S.Singade

  2. 2.Block Development OfficerPanchayat Samiti Bhandara

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Summary The Maharashtra Industrial Court set aside the Labour Court's decision that had ordered reinstatement of a Gram Rojgar Sevak (village worker) with 50% back wages, finding the lower court committed legal infirmities by not making the Gramsabha (village assembly) and the replacement employee as necessary parties to the case. The court held that since the Gramsabha alone has authority to appoint and terminate such positions under Government resolution 2011, it should have been included as a party, and remitted the matter back to the Labour Court for fresh adjudication after adding these necessary parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Member

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Citation

    Member

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Member

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Member

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Member

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Member

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Member

  10. 19-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Member

  11. 28-Nov-2025

    Order on T.I.

  12. 28-Nov-2025

    Reply

    Member

  13. 26-Nov-2025

    Order below Exh._____

    Member

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Member

  15. 27-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 27-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Maharashtra Industrial Court set aside the Labour Court's decision that had ordered reinstatement of a Gram Rojgar Sevak (village worker) with 50% back wages, finding the lower court committed legal infirmities by not making the Gramsabha (village assembly) and the replacement employee as necessary parties to the case. The court held that since the Gramsabha alone has authority to appoint and terminate such positions under Government resolution 2011, it should have been included as a party, and remitted the matter back to the Labour Court for fresh adjudication after adding these necessary parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case