Rashtriya Mazdoor Sena Through its President Shri Vijay Namdeorao Patil vs State of Maharashtra Through its Principal Secretary. and other — 45/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Complaint
CNR: MHIC360000892025
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
125/2025
Filing Date
18-09-2025
Registration No
45/2025
Registration Date
18-09-2025
Court
Member, Industrial Court, Bhandara
Judge
1-MEMBER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rashtriya Mazdoor Sena Through its President Shri Vijay Namdeorao Patil
Adv. V.A.Bhoyar
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through its Principal Secretary. and other
Director,Medical Education and Research, Govt. Dental College and Hospital Building
Civil Surgeon K.T.S General Hospital
Smart Services Pvt. Ltd., Through its Director
Government Medical College and Hospital Through its Dean
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER
Steps
Awaiting Report
Notice
Notice
Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Steps |
| 30-01-2026 | Awaiting Report |
| 19-12-2025 | Notice |
| 28-11-2025 | Notice |
| 07-11-2025 | Notice |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court, Bhandara allowed the interim relief application (Exhibit U-6) filed by Rashtriya Mazdoor Sena seeking regularization and permanency for their members employed with the State of Maharashtra's Medical Education and Drugs Department. The court dispensed with the service of notice under Rule 115(3) of the Industrial Court Practice Regulations, 1975, considering the apprehension that the respondent may terminate union members' services if notice is served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court, Bhandara allowed the interim relief application (Exhibit U-6) filed by Rashtriya Mazdoor Sena seeking regularization and permanency for their members employed with the State of Maharashtra's Medical Education and Drugs Department. The court dispensed with the service of notice under Rule 115(3) of the Industrial Court Practice Regulations, 1975, considering the apprehension that the respondent may terminate union members' services if notice is served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts