Madhukar Domnu Khobragade and others vs Managing Director Maharashtra Minerals Corporation Ltd. And 2 Advocate - V.S.Enchilwar — 1/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section c d 5. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Con of Del ULP
CNR: MHIC360000122025
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
14/2025
Filing Date
01-02-2025
Registration No
1/2025
Registration Date
01-02-2025
Court
Member, Industrial Court, Bhandara
Judge
1-MEMBER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Madhukar Domnu Khobragade and others
Adv. M.L. Bhure
Pandhari Daji Kamble on behalf of legal heir Kanta Pandhari Kamble
Mukhdu Daji Kamble
Manik Urkuda Kamble
Mahananda Mukhdu Kamble
Hari Bhika Hanwate on behalf of his legal heirs parbata hari hanwate
Raybhan Sukru Navle
Respondent(s)
Managing Director Maharashtra Minerals Corporation Ltd. And 2 Advocate - V.S.Enchilwar
Maharashtra Minerals Corporation Ltd.
Asst. Labour Commissioner
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER
Arguments
Arguments
Chief and cross of Respondent
Respondent Evidence
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-02-2026 | Chief and cross of Respondent |
| 16-01-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
| 02-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is an Industrial Court (Aurangabad) order dated 06/03/2026 in a labor dispute case (MULP 01/25). The court rejected the petitioner's contentions regarding non-compliance with procedural requirements and lack of cooperation, finding them without merit. The petition was dismissed with directions that the respondent provide a brief written statement to the court witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is an Industrial Court (Aurangabad) order dated 06/03/2026 in a labor dispute case (MULP 01/25). The court rejected the petitioner's contentions regarding non-compliance with procedural requirements and lack of cooperation, finding them without merit. The petition was dismissed with directions that the respondent provide a brief written statement to the court witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts