Chandrapshekhar Anandrao Ninave vs Maha. State Road Transport Corporation, Through Divi. Controller, Chandrapur Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao — 60/2024

Case under Maha.recognition Trade Union & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act,1971 Section 28. Status: Chief of Respondent. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Chief of Respondent Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Comp. ULP

CNR: MHIC340000912024

Filing Number

101/2024

Filing Date

05-Aug-2024

Registration No

60/2024

Registration Date

05-Aug-2024

Court

Industrial Court,Chandrapur

Judge

1-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maha.recognition Trade Union & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act,1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandrapshekhar Anandrao Ninave

    Adv. Shri V.M. Shikare, Representative

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maha. State Road Transport Corporation, Through Divi. Controller, Chandrapur Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  7. 12-Dec-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  8. 26-Nov-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  9. 14-Oct-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  10. 06-Oct-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  11. 22-Sep-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  12. 14-Aug-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  13. 28-Jul-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  14. 07-Jul-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  15. 21-Jun-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  16. 10-Jun-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  17. 29-Apr-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  18. 24-Apr-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  19. 16-Apr-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    The petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner filed a false affidavit and provided false evidence, and therefore rejected the petition without accepting the arguments raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 16-Apr-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  21. 08-Apr-2025

    Chief of Complainant

    Member

  22. 27-Mar-2025

    Chief of Complainant

    Member

  23. 11-Mar-2025

    Chief of Complainant

    Member

  24. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  25. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  26. 06-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Member

  27. 16-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Member

  28. 18-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Member

  29. 25-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  30. 30-Sep-2024

    Notice

    Member

  31. 09-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 05-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The petition is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner filed a false affidavit and provided false evidence, and therefore rejected the petition without accepting the arguments raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case