Dinesh Sudhakar Mutthakar vs M.S.R.T.C. Gadchiroli through its Divisional contrloller Advocate - Patil Bhaskar Mansaram — 54/2023

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 01-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Comp. ULP

CNR: MHIC340000822023

Filing Number

84/2023

Filing Date

26-Jul-2023

Registration No

54/2023

Registration Date

26-Jul-2023

Court

Industrial Court,Chandrapur

Judge

1-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dinesh Sudhakar Mutthakar

    Adv. Shri V.M. Shikare, Representative

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.S.R.T.C. Gadchiroli through its Divisional contrloller Advocate - Patil Bhaskar Mansaram

  2. 2.Divisional Traffic Supdt. DFL MSRTC Gadchiroi

    Adv. Patil Bhaskar Mansaram

Case History

  1. 01-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on Pre IssueView PDF

    Summary: The Industrial Court, Chandrapur upheld the disciplinary proceedings against Dinesh Sudhakar Muthalkar, a bus conductor with Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, finding the enquiry procedure legal, proper, and just. The court affirmed that the enquiry officer's findings—that the complainant failed to issue tickets to 10 passengers despite collecting fares from them—were legal, proper, and not perverse. The matter is now scheduled for evidence hearing on the proportionality of the punishment (withholding of two future increments). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Member

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  7. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  8. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  9. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  10. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  11. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  12. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  13. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  14. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  15. 07-May-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  16. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  17. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  18. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  19. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  20. 25-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Member

  21. 05-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Member

  22. 22-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Member

  23. 08-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Member

  24. 11-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  25. 25-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  26. 06-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  27. 23-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  28. 05-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  29. 21-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  30. 04-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  31. 14-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  32. 31-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  33. 10-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  34. 26-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  35. 12-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  36. 24-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  37. 27-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  38. 01-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  39. 31-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  40. 09-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  41. 09-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  42. 08-Nov-2023

    lok Adalat

    Member

  43. 18-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  44. 27-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  45. 13-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  46. 23-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  47. 09-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 26-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court, Chandrapur upheld the disciplinary proceedings against Dinesh Sudhakar Muthalkar, a bus conductor with Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, finding the enquiry procedure legal, proper, and just. The court affirmed that the enquiry officer's findings—that the complainant failed to issue tickets to 10 passengers despite collecting fares from them—were legal, proper, and not perverse. The matter is now scheduled for evidence hearing on the proportionality of the punishment (withholding of two future increments). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case