Moreshwar Anandrao Nikhare vs M.S.R.T.C. Chandrapur Advocate - Patil Bhaskar Mansaram — 49/2023

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Respondents Evidence. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Respondents Evidence Next hearing 08-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Comp. ULP

CNR: MHIC340000712023

Filing Number

73/2023

Filing Date

07-Jul-2023

Registration No

49/2023

Registration Date

07-Jul-2023

Court

Industrial Court,Chandrapur

Judge

1-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Moreshwar Anandrao Nikhare

    Adv. Shri V.M. Shikare, Representative

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.S.R.T.C. Chandrapur Advocate - Patil Bhaskar Mansaram

  2. 2.The Divisional Traffic Supdt.Dfl ,MSRTC Chandrapur

    Adv. Patil Bhaskar Mansaram

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on Pre IssueView PDF

    Summary The Industrial Court, Chandrapur found the domestic enquiry against complainant Moreshwar Anandrao Nikhare to be procedurally unfair and legally defective, declaring the enquiry officer's findings perverse. The court held that the enquiry violated natural justice principles as the officer acted as investigator, prosecutor, and judge without examining witnesses or allowing cross-examination, instead relying solely on documentary evidence and the reporting officer's report. The respondents (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation) are permitted to reprove the charges against the complainant before the court through evidence if they wish. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  7. 20-Nov-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  9. 17-Sep-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  10. 13-Aug-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  11. 30-Jul-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  12. 02-Jul-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  13. 20-Jun-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  14. 12-Jun-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  15. 05-May-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  16. 24-Apr-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  17. 09-Apr-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  18. 02-Apr-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  19. 19-Mar-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  20. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  21. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  22. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  23. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  24. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  25. 02-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Member

  26. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  27. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  28. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  29. 24-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  30. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  31. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Member

  32. 05-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  33. 27-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  34. 18-Jul-2024

    lok Adalat

    Member

  35. 27-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  36. 03-May-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  37. 30-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  38. 28-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  39. 08-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  40. 15-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  41. 09-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  42. 21-Nov-2023

    lok Adalat

    Member

  43. 26-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  44. 03-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  45. 04-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  46. 07-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 07-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 49/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Industrial Court, Chandrapur found the domestic enquiry against complainant Moreshwar Anandrao Nikhare to be procedurally unfair and legally defective, declaring the enquiry officer's findings perverse. The court held that the enquiry violated natural justice principles as the officer acted as investigator, prosecutor, and judge without examining witnesses or allowing cross-examination, instead relying solely on documentary evidence and the reporting officer's report. The respondents (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation) are permitted to reprove the charges against the complainant before the court through evidence if they wish. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case