Moreshwar Anandrao Nikhare vs M.S.R.T.C. Chandrapur Advocate - Patil Bhaskar Mansaram — 49/2023
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Respondents Evidence. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
Comp. ULP
CNR: MHIC340000712023
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
73/2023
Filing Date
07-07-2023
Registration No
49/2023
Registration Date
07-07-2023
Court
Industrial Court,Chandrapur
Judge
1-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Moreshwar Anandrao Nikhare
Adv. Shri V.M. Shikare, Representative
Respondent(s)
M.S.R.T.C. Chandrapur Advocate - Patil Bhaskar Mansaram
The Divisional Traffic Supdt.Dfl ,MSRTC Chandrapur
Adv. Patil Bhaskar Mansaram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member
Respondents Evidence
Hearing on Preliminary Issues
Hearing on Preliminary Issues
Hearing on Preliminary Issues
Hearing on Preliminary Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 04-03-2026 | Hearing on Preliminary Issues |
| 18-02-2026 | Hearing on Preliminary Issues |
| 07-01-2026 | Hearing on Preliminary Issues |
| 20-11-2025 | Hearing on Preliminary Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court, Chandrapur found the domestic enquiry against complainant Moreshwar Anandrao Nikhare to be procedurally unfair and legally defective, declaring the enquiry officer's findings perverse. The court held that the enquiry violated natural justice principles as the officer acted as investigator, prosecutor, and judge without examining witnesses or allowing cross-examination, instead relying solely on documentary evidence and the reporting officer's report. The respondents (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation) are permitted to reprove the charges against the complainant before the court through evidence if they wish. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court, Chandrapur found the domestic enquiry against complainant Moreshwar Anandrao Nikhare to be procedurally unfair and legally defective, declaring the enquiry officer's findings perverse. The court held that the enquiry violated natural justice principles as the officer acted as investigator, prosecutor, and judge without examining witnesses or allowing cross-examination, instead relying solely on documentary evidence and the reporting officer's report. The respondents (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation) are permitted to reprove the charges against the complainant before the court through evidence if they wish. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts