Ku. Rekha Balkrishna Balekarmarkar vs M S R T C Gadchiroli 1 Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao — 23/2020
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Respondents Evidence. Next hearing: 31st March 2026.
Comp. ULP
CNR: MHIC340000562020
Next Hearing
31st March 2026
Filing Number
69/2020
Filing Date
23-09-2020
Registration No
23/2020
Registration Date
23-09-2020
Court
Industrial Court,Chandrapur
Judge
1-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ku. Rekha Balkrishna Balekarmarkar
Adv. Wankhade Milind Manoharrao
Respondent(s)
M S R T C Gadchiroli 1 Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao
First Appellae Authority, Divisional Controller, Gadchiroli
Adv. Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 30-01-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 20-01-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is an Industrial Court order from Chandrapur dated 12/09/2025 (Case No. ULP 23/2020, Ni. C-4) in Marathi. The court dismissed the worker's petition entirely. The court found that the inspection reports lacked proper documentation of working hours, the vehicle's registration showed only Rs. 85 permit fee (insufficient for commercial use), and rejected the worker's claims of wrongful termination and false affidavit evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is an Industrial Court order from Chandrapur dated 12/09/2025 (Case No. ULP 23/2020, Ni. C-4) in Marathi. The court dismissed the worker's petition entirely. The court found that the inspection reports lacked proper documentation of working hours, the vehicle's registration showed only Rs. 85 permit fee (insufficient for commercial use), and rejected the worker's claims of wrongful termination and false affidavit evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts