Ku. Rekha Balkrishna Balekarmarkar vs M S R T C Gadchiroli 1 Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao — 23/2020

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Respondents Evidence. Next hearing: 31st March 2026.

Respondents Evidence Next hearing 31-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Comp. ULP

CNR: MHIC340000562020

Filing Number

69/2020

Filing Date

23-Sep-2020

Registration No

23/2020

Registration Date

23-Sep-2020

Court

Industrial Court,Chandrapur

Judge

1-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ku. Rekha Balkrishna Balekarmarkar

    Adv. Wankhade Milind Manoharrao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M S R T C Gadchiroli 1 Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao

  2. 2.First Appellae Authority, Divisional Controller, Gadchiroli

    Adv. Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao

Case History

  1. 31-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  12. 28-Oct-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  13. 10-Oct-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  14. 26-Sep-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  15. 19-Sep-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  16. 12-Sep-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    This is an Industrial Court order from Chandrapur dated 12/09/2025 (Case No. ULP 23/2020, Ni. C-4) in Marathi. The court dismissed the worker's petition entirely. The court found that the inspection reports lacked proper documentation of working hours, the vehicle's registration showed only Rs. 85 permit fee (insufficient for commercial use), and rejected the worker's claims of wrongful termination and false affidavit evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 12-Sep-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  18. 26-Aug-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  19. 05-Aug-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  20. 18-Jul-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  21. 11-Jul-2025

    Chief of Respondent

    Member

  22. 27-Jun-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  23. 10-Jun-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  24. 29-Apr-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  25. 22-Apr-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  26. 15-Apr-2025

    Order on Pre IssueView PDF

  27. 15-Apr-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Member

  28. 08-Apr-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  29. 28-Mar-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  30. 18-Mar-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  31. 11-Mar-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  32. 04-Mar-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  33. 21-Feb-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  34. 11-Feb-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  35. 04-Feb-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  36. 28-Jan-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  37. 17-Jan-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  38. 03-Jan-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  39. 28-Nov-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Member

  40. 06-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Member

  41. 18-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Member

  42. 27-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Member

  43. 27-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Member

  44. 13-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  45. 23-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  46. 02-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  47. 07-May-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  48. 12-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  49. 26-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  50. 27-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  51. 13-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  52. 30-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  53. 16-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Member

  54. 12-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  55. 03-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    Member

  56. 13-Oct-2023

    Service Report

    Member

  57. 22-Sep-2023

    Service Report

    Member

  58. 29-Aug-2023

    Service Report

    Member

  59. 25-Jul-2023

    Service Report

    Member

  60. 04-Jul-2023

    Service Report

    Member

  61. 06-Jun-2023

    Service Report

    Member

  62. 25-Apr-2023

    Service Report

    Member

  63. 07-Mar-2023

    Notice

    Member

  64. 07-Feb-2023

    Notice

    Member

  65. 10-Jan-2023

    Notice

    Member

  66. 06-Dec-2022

    Notice

    Member

  67. 18-Oct-2022

    Notice

    Member

  68. 23-Sep-2022

    Notice

    Member

  69. 12-Aug-2022

    Notice

    Member

  70. 28-Jun-2022

    Notice

    Member

  71. 19-Apr-2022

    Notice

    Member

  72. 08-Apr-2022

    Notice

    Member

  73. 18-Feb-2022

    Notice

    Member

  74. 21-Jan-2022

    Notice

    Member

  75. 14-Dec-2021

    Notice

    Member

  76. 16-Nov-2021

    Notice

    Member

  77. 05-Oct-2021

    Notice

    Member

  78. 07-Sep-2021

    Notice

    Member

  79. 27-Jul-2021

    Notice

    Member

  80. 28-Jun-2021

    Notice

    Member

  81. 04-May-2021

    Order

    Member

  82. 20-Apr-2021

    Order

    Member

  83. 23-Mar-2021

    Order

    Member

  84. 23-Feb-2021

    Order

    Member

  85. 02-Feb-2021

    Order

    Member

  86. 12-Jan-2021

    Order

    Member

  87. 01-Dec-2020

    Order

    Member

  88. 27-Oct-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  89. 23-Sep-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2020

casestatus.in Summary

This is an Industrial Court order from Chandrapur dated 12/09/2025 (Case No. ULP 23/2020, Ni. C-4) in Marathi. The court dismissed the worker's petition entirely. The court found that the inspection reports lacked proper documentation of working hours, the vehicle's registration showed only Rs. 85 permit fee (insufficient for commercial use), and rejected the worker's claims of wrongful termination and false affidavit evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case