Gangadhar Sukhdev Lad vs M.S.R.T.C. through its Divisional Traffic Officer ,Gadchiroli Advocate - Patil Bhaskar Mansaram — 21/2024

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28,30.2. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Comp. ULP

CNR: MHIC340000292024

Filing Number

31/2024

Filing Date

19-Mar-2024

Registration No

21/2024

Registration Date

19-Mar-2024

Court

Industrial Court,Chandrapur

Judge

1-Member

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28,30.2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gangadhar Sukhdev Lad

    Adv. Wankhade Milind Manoharrao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.S.R.T.C. through its Divisional Traffic Officer ,Gadchiroli Advocate - Patil Bhaskar Mansaram

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Member

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Member

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Member

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Interim OrderView PDF

    Summary The Industrial Court, Chandrapur allowed the interim relief application filed by bus conductor Gangadhar against Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. The court restrained the respondents from implementing the punishment order dated 12.03.2024 (stopping annual increments for 3 years) till final disposal of the complaint, finding that the inquiry officer violated natural justice principles by not examining independent witnesses and failed to substantiate charges with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Member

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    Order

    Member

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Order

    Member

  9. 14-Jan-2026

    Order

    Member

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Order

    Member

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Order

    Member

  12. 12-Dec-2025

    Order

    Member

  13. 02-Dec-2025

    Order

    Member

  14. 25-Nov-2025

    Order

    Member

  15. 18-Nov-2025

    Order

    Member

  16. 07-Nov-2025

    Order

    Member

  17. 14-Oct-2025

    Order

    Member

  18. 07-Oct-2025

    Order

    Member

  19. 23-Sep-2025

    Order

    Member

  20. 09-Sep-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  21. 12-Aug-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  22. 18-Jul-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  23. 11-Jul-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  24. 01-Jul-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  25. 13-Jun-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  26. 29-Apr-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  27. 11-Apr-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  28. 25-Mar-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  29. 05-Mar-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Member

  30. 18-Feb-2025

    Reply

    Member

  31. 28-Jan-2025

    Reply

    Member

  32. 10-Jan-2025

    Reply

    Member

  33. 17-Dec-2024

    Reply

    Member

  34. 03-Dec-2024

    Reply

    Member

  35. 08-Nov-2024

    Reply

    Member

  36. 18-Oct-2024

    Reply

    Member

  37. 27-Sep-2024

    Reply

    Member

  38. 10-Sep-2024

    Reply

    Member

  39. 27-Jul-2024

    Reply

    Member

  40. 16-Jul-2024

    lok Adalat

    Member

  41. 25-Jun-2024

    Reply

    Member

  42. 07-May-2024

    Reply

    Member

  43. 12-Apr-2024

    Reply

    Member

  44. 22-Mar-2024

    Reply

    Member

  45. 19-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 19-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Industrial Court, Chandrapur allowed the interim relief application filed by bus conductor Gangadhar against Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. The court restrained the respondents from implementing the punishment order dated 12.03.2024 (stopping annual increments for 3 years) till final disposal of the complaint, finding that the inquiry officer violated natural justice principles by not examining independent witnesses and failed to substantiate charges with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case