Gangadhar Sukhdev Lad vs M.S.R.T.C. through its Divisional Traffic Officer ,Gadchiroli Advocate - Patil Bhaskar Mansaram — 21/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28,30.2. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Comp. ULP
CNR: MHIC340000292024
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
31/2024
Filing Date
19-03-2024
Registration No
21/2024
Registration Date
19-03-2024
Court
Industrial Court,Chandrapur
Judge
1-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gangadhar Sukhdev Lad
Adv. Wankhade Milind Manoharrao
Respondent(s)
M.S.R.T.C. through its Divisional Traffic Officer ,Gadchiroli Advocate - Patil Bhaskar Mansaram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 06-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 13-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 23-01-2026 | Written Statement |
| 21-01-2026 | Order |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court, Chandrapur allowed the interim relief application filed by bus conductor Gangadhar against Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. The court restrained the respondents from implementing the punishment order dated 12.03.2024 (stopping annual increments for 3 years) till final disposal of the complaint, finding that the inquiry officer violated natural justice principles by not examining independent witnesses and failed to substantiate charges with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court, Chandrapur allowed the interim relief application filed by bus conductor Gangadhar against Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. The court restrained the respondents from implementing the punishment order dated 12.03.2024 (stopping annual increments for 3 years) till final disposal of the complaint, finding that the inquiry officer violated natural justice principles by not examining independent witnesses and failed to substantiate charges with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts