Chandramani Uttam Ingle vs The Registrar Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krushi vidyapeeth akola Advocate - S. G. Gawai — 261/2022

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 2830(2). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHIC300003332022

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

333/2022

Filing Date

27-09-2022

Registration No

261/2022

Registration Date

28-09-2022

Court

Industrial Court, Akola

Judge

1-Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 2830(2)

Petitioner(s)

Chandramani Uttam Ingle

Adv. P. R.Dharmadhikari

Respondent(s)

The Registrar Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krushi vidyapeeth akola Advocate - S. G. Gawai

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

15-01-2026

EVIDENCE

21-11-2025

EVIDENCE

10-09-2025

EVIDENCE

09-07-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

27-03-2024
Order below Exh 2

Summary: The Industrial Court, Akola allowed the interim relief application (Complaint ULP No. 261 of 2022) filed by Chandramani Uttam Ingle, a tractor driver seeking permanency and regularization with Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyapeeth. The court found the complainant made out a prima facie case and that balance of convenience favored him. The respondent is directed not to terminate the complainant's services without due process of law and must provide work according to seniority list and work availability pending final disposal of the main complaint on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court, Akola allowed the interim relief application (Complaint ULP No. 261 of 2022) filed by Chandramani Uttam Ingle, a tractor driver seeking permanency and regularization with Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyapeeth. The court found the complainant made out a prima facie case and that balance of convenience favored him. The respondent is directed not to terminate the complainant's services without due process of law and must provide work according to seniority list and work availability pending final disposal of the main complaint on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Industrial Court, Akola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case