Sunanda Damodar Barde vs Kulsachiv Dr. P.D.K.V. Akola and one Advocate - S.S.Rajderkar — 182/2022

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28,30(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHIC300001982022

Filing Number

198/2022

Filing Date

22-Apr-2022

Registration No

182/2022

Registration Date

22-Apr-2022

Court

Industrial Court, Akola

Judge

1-Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28,30(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunanda Damodar Barde

    Adv. Avinash Shrikrushna Ujade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kulsachiv Dr. P.D.K.V. Akola and one Advocate - S.S.Rajderkar

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  3. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  4. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  5. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  6. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  7. 07-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  8. 17-Jun-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  9. 23-Jan-2025

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  10. 21-Oct-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  11. 01-Aug-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  12. 04-Jul-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  13. 18-Jun-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  14. 10-May-2024

    Order Below Exh.View PDF

    Summary: The Industrial Court, Akola adjourned the case to 18/06/2024 for the respondents to file their reply. The Court directed the respondents to comply with all previous directions issued in the interim relief application, noting that the complainant alleged the Court's orders regarding daily wagers versus contractual employees were not being followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 10-May-2024

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  16. 02-May-2024

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  17. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  18. 16-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  19. 06-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  20. 30-Sep-2023

    Document / Issue

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  21. 11-Aug-2023

    Document / Issue

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  22. 10-Jul-2023

    Hearing On Intrim Relief

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  23. 08-Jun-2023

    Order Below Exh. 1View PDF

  24. 08-Jun-2023

    Hearing On Intrim Relief

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  25. 05-Jun-2023

    Hearing On Intrim Relief

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  26. 06-May-2023

    Order Below Exh.View PDF

  27. 06-May-2023

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  28. 21-Mar-2023

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  29. 04-Feb-2023

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  30. 17-Dec-2022

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  31. 09-Nov-2022

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  32. 15-Sep-2022

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  33. 22-Jul-2022

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  34. 08-Jun-2022

    Reply

    Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

  35. 26-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 22-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 182/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court, Akola adjourned the case to 18/06/2024 for the respondents to file their reply. The Court directed the respondents to comply with all previous directions issued in the interim relief application, noting that the complainant alleged the Court's orders regarding daily wagers versus contractual employees were not being followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case