Gajanan Pandurang Bharsake vs The Registrar, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidhyapith, Akola Advocate - S. G. Gawai — 86/2022

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28,30(2). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHIC300000962022

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

Filing Number

96/2022

Filing Date

03-03-2022

Registration No

86/2022

Registration Date

03-03-2022

Court

Industrial Court, Akola

Judge

1-Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28,30(2)

Petitioner(s)

Gajanan Pandurang Bharsake

Adv. P. R.Dharmadhikari

Respondent(s)

The Registrar, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidhyapith, Akola Advocate - S. G. Gawai

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Akola.

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

15-01-2026

EVIDENCE

21-11-2025

EVIDENCE

10-09-2025

EVIDENCE

09-07-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

27-03-2024
Order below Exh 2

Summary: The Industrial Court, Akola granted interim relief in Complaint ULP No. 86 of 2022 filed by Gajanan Pandurang Bharsake, a daily wage labourer seeking permanency and regularization with Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyapeeth. The Court found that the complainant made out a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience favored him, directing the respondent not to terminate his services without due process of law and to provide work according to seniority list pending final disposal of the main complaint on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court, Akola granted interim relief in Complaint ULP No. 86 of 2022 filed by Gajanan Pandurang Bharsake, a daily wage labourer seeking permanency and regularization with Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyapeeth. The Court found that the complainant made out a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience favored him, directing the respondent not to terminate his services without due process of law and to provide work according to seniority list pending final disposal of the main complaint on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Industrial Court, Akola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case