Bebi Kashiram Wankhade vs Registrar, Dr. P. D. K. V. Akola Advocate - U. K. Kavishwar — 69/2022
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28,30(2). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC300000772022
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
77/2022
Filing Date
25-02-2022
Registration No
69/2022
Registration Date
25-02-2022
Court
Industrial Court, Akola
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bebi Kashiram Wankhade
Adv. P. R.Dharmadhikari
Respondent(s)
Registrar, Dr. P. D. K. V. Akola Advocate - U. K. Kavishwar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 15-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 14-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 16-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-07-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The Industrial Court, Akola partly allowed the interim relief application filed by Bebi Kashiram Wankhade, a daily wages labourer employed since 1987. The court directed the respondent (Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyapeeth) to continue her employment based on work availability and seniority during the pendency of the main complaint seeking service regularization. However, the court granted the employer liberty to take lawful action against the complainant as per due procedure of law if contingency arises, balancing the employee's livelihood protection with the employer's operational requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The Industrial Court, Akola partly allowed the interim relief application filed by Bebi Kashiram Wankhade, a daily wages labourer employed since 1987. The court directed the respondent (Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyapeeth) to continue her employment based on work availability and seniority during the pendency of the main complaint seeking service regularization. However, the court granted the employer liberty to take lawful action against the complainant as per due procedure of law if contingency arises, balancing the employee's livelihood protection with the employer's operational requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts