Shaikh Naim Abdul Khalil vs The Registrar, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidhyapith, Akola Advocate - S.S.Rajderkar — 62/2022
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28,30(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC300000702022
Filing Number
70/2022
Filing Date
25-Feb-2022
Registration No
62/2022
Registration Date
25-Feb-2022
Court
Industrial Court, Akola
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shaikh Naim Abdul Khalil
Adv. P. R.Dharmadhikari
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Registrar, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidhyapith, Akola Advocate - S.S.Rajderkar
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
07-Dec-2024
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
23-Sep-2024
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
13-Jun-2024
Document / Issue
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
24-Jan-2024
Document / Issue
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
06-Nov-2023
Document / Issue
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
29-Sep-2023
Document / Issue
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
17-Jul-2023
Document / Issue
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
12-Apr-2023
Document / Issue
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
02-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
09-Dec-2022
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
14-Oct-2022
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
11-Aug-2022
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
27-Jun-2022
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
31-Mar-2022
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
-
25-Feb-2022
Order below Exh 2View PDF
The Industrial Court's application under Section 30(2) of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act was partly allowed. The court directed the respondent employer to continue the complainant's employment as per work availability and seniority, while granting the employer liberty to take lawful action following due procedure if contingency arises. The court found the complainant had partly made out a case of unfair labour practice based on 5+ years of service with 240+ working days annually, but rejected blanket protection since employment was on daily wage basis contingent on work availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 62/2022
The Industrial Court's application under Section 30(2) of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act was partly allowed. The court directed the respondent employer to continue the complainant's employment as per work availability and seniority, while granting the employer liberty to take lawful action following due procedure if contingency arises. The court found the complainant had partly made out a case of unfair labour practice based on 5+ years of service with 240+ working days annually, but rejected blanket protection since employment was on daily wage basis contingent on work availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts