Sunil Ramdas Dahikar vs The Registrar, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidhyapith, Akola Advocate - S.S.Rajderkar — 18/2022
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC300000182022
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
18/2022
Filing Date
27-01-2022
Registration No
18/2022
Registration Date
27-01-2022
Court
Industrial Court, Akola
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil Ramdas Dahikar
Adv. P. R.Dharmadhikari
Respondent(s)
The Registrar, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidhyapith, Akola Advocate - S.S.Rajderkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Akola.
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 15-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 14-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 16-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-07-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court partly allowed the interim relief application filed by Sunil Ramdas Dahikar, a daily wage laborer employed since 2008 by Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyapeeth, Akola. The court directed the respondent to continue the complainant's employment as per work availability and seniority while granting the respondent liberty to take lawful action following due procedure if contingency arises. The court found a partly made-out prima facie case of unfair labor practice but rejected the request for blanket employment protection, noting the employee worked on irregular daily-wage basis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court partly allowed the interim relief application filed by Sunil Ramdas Dahikar, a daily wage laborer employed since 2008 by Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyapeeth, Akola. The court directed the respondent to continue the complainant's employment as per work availability and seniority while granting the respondent liberty to take lawful action following due procedure if contingency arises. The court found a partly made-out prima facie case of unfair labor practice but rejected the request for blanket employment protection, noting the employee worked on irregular daily-wage basis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts