Dnyaneshwar Mete vs Regional Manager M.S.R.T.C. Amravati and 2 Advocate - V.D. Tayade — 5000112/2015
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28R/w.itemNos.5,6and9ofSch-IV. Status: Respondent Evidence. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC270002052015
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
Filing Number
5000216/2015
Filing Date
29-10-2015
Registration No
5000112/2015
Registration Date
29-10-2015
Court
Industrial Court, Amravati
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dnyaneshwar Mete
Adv. S.M. Rathi
Respondent(s)
Regional Manager M.S.R.T.C. Amravati and 2 Advocate - V.D. Tayade
Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C
Depot Manager, M.S.R.T.C, Chandur Rly.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
| 06-01-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
| 19-11-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
| 23-09-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
| 02-08-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) allowed the interim relief application filed by Dnyaneshwar Marotirao Mete, a bus cleaner employed by Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation since 1985. The court directed the employer not to terminate the applicant's services without following due process of law, pending disposal of the main unfair labour practice complaint seeking regularization and permanency. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent establishing that employment must be protected when employees file regularization cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) allowed the interim relief application filed by Dnyaneshwar Marotirao Mete, a bus cleaner employed by Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation since 1985. The court directed the employer not to terminate the applicant's services without following due process of law, pending disposal of the main unfair labour practice complaint seeking regularization and permanency. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent establishing that employment must be protected when employees file regularization cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts