Nilesh Devidasrao Rane vs Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C. Amravati and 1 Advocate - S.W. Gawande — 77/2020
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28,30(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC270001622020
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
Filing Number
195/2020
Filing Date
14-12-2020
Registration No
77/2020
Registration Date
14-12-2020
Court
Industrial Court, Amravati
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nilesh Devidasrao Rane
Adv. D.B. Gawande
Respondent(s)
Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C. Amravati and 1 Advocate - S.W. Gawande
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 24-09-2025 | Evidence |
| 01-08-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court at Amravati rejected the complainant's interim application seeking to stay the implementation of a punishment order (withholding two annual increments) imposed for a bus accident caused on 27-06-2018. The court allowed the respondents' application for time to file their reply and written statement, finding prima facie that the complainant was responsible for the accident and noting a pattern of repeated accidents. The court also declined to grant any interim relief or status quo protection pending the respondents' response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court at Amravati rejected the complainant's interim application seeking to stay the implementation of a punishment order (withholding two annual increments) imposed for a bus accident caused on 27-06-2018. The court allowed the respondents' application for time to file their reply and written statement, finding prima facie that the complainant was responsible for the accident and noting a pattern of repeated accidents. The court also declined to grant any interim relief or status quo protection pending the respondents' response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts