Rupesh Surendra Kokate and 1 vs Divisional Controller , S. T. Amravati and 1 Advocate - V.D. Tayade — 92/2023
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28,30(2). Status: Documents Issues. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC270001372023
Filing Number
137/2023
Filing Date
18-Aug-2023
Registration No
92/2023
Registration Date
18-Aug-2023
Court
Industrial Court, Amravati
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rupesh Surendra Kokate and 1
Adv. D.B. Gawande
Respondent(s)
-
1.Divisional Controller , S. T. Amravati and 1 Advocate - V.D. Tayade
Case History
-
13-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Documents Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
12-Jan-2026
Documents Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
27-Nov-2025
Documents Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
29-Oct-2025
Documents Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
08-Sep-2025
Documents Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
31-Jul-2025
Documents Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
11-Jun-2025
Documents Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
17-Mar-2025
Documents Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
07-Jan-2025
Documents Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
23-Oct-2024
Documents Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
19-Aug-2024
Documents Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
22-Jun-2024
Documents Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
26-Apr-2024
Documents Issues
Member Industrial Court
-
27-Feb-2024
Documents Issues
Member Industrial Court
-
11-Jan-2024
Documents Issues
Member Industrial Court
-
09-Nov-2023
Documents Issues
Member Industrial Court
-
21-Sep-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
21-Sep-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Court Order Summary The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) rejected the application filed by two MSRTC drivers (Rupesh Kokate and another) seeking relief under the MRTU & PULP Act on 21-09-2023. The court found that the complainants failed to establish a prima facie case of unfair labor practice, holding that they were legitimately appointed as "Driver cum Conductor (Junior)" positions as per the 2015 advertisement and Standing Orders, and thus could lawfully be assigned conductor duties. The court noted the complainants suppressed material facts and unjustifiably delayed raising objections for over 6 years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Sep-2023
Documents Issues
Member Industrial Court
-
15-Sep-2023
Order below Exh.______
Member Industrial Court
-
02-Sep-2023
Order below Exh.______
Member Industrial Court
-
30-Aug-2023
Hearing on Interim Relief
Member Industrial Court
-
23-Aug-2023
Reply
Member Industrial Court
-
18-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 92/2023
Court Order Summary The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) rejected the application filed by two MSRTC drivers (Rupesh Kokate and another) seeking relief under the MRTU & PULP Act on 21-09-2023. The court found that the complainants failed to establish a prima facie case of unfair labor practice, holding that they were legitimately appointed as "Driver cum Conductor (Junior)" positions as per the 2015 advertisement and Standing Orders, and thus could lawfully be assigned conductor duties. The court noted the complainants suppressed material facts and unjustifiably delayed raising objections for over 6 years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts