Ku. Vaishali Annaji Patil vs Commissioner, Social Welfare Commissionerate Pune and 1 Advocate - P.S. Ganorkar — 86/2023
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28,30(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 11th March 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC270001272023
Filing Number
127/2023
Filing Date
25-07-2023
Registration No
86/2023
Registration Date
25-07-2023
Court
Industrial Court, Amravati
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ku. Vaishali Annaji Patil
Adv. D.B. Gawande
Respondent(s)
Commissioner, Social Welfare Commissionerate Pune and 1 Advocate - P.S. Ganorkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Documents Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-01-2026 | Documents Issues |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) dismissed the complaint filed by Vaishali Annaji Patil against the Commissioner, Social Welfare Commissionerate, Pune in default. The court found that despite issues being framed on 23.02.2026 and the matter being posted for the complainant's evidence on multiple dates (28.02.2026 and 06.03.2026), the complainant failed to present any evidence and was absent on the hearing date with no adjournment application, indicating unwillingness to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) dismissed the complaint filed by Vaishali Annaji Patil against the Commissioner, Social Welfare Commissionerate, Pune in default. The court found that despite issues being framed on 23.02.2026 and the matter being posted for the complainant's evidence on multiple dates (28.02.2026 and 06.03.2026), the complainant failed to present any evidence and was absent on the hearing date with no adjournment application, indicating unwillingness to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts