Chanda Chhedilal Yadav vs Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati Advocate - A. A. Dubey — 51/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 12th March 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC270000672025
Filing Number
67/2025
Filing Date
29-05-2025
Registration No
51/2025
Registration Date
29-05-2025
Court
Industrial Court, Amravati
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chanda Chhedilal Yadav
Adv. D.B. Gawande
Respondent(s)
Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati Advocate - A. A. Dubey
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
Disposed
Order below Exh.______
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Order below Exh.______ |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The Industrial Court, Amravati dismissed the unfair labor practice complaint filed by Chanda Chhedilal Yadav against the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati in default on 12.03.2026. The complainant failed to present evidence despite multiple adjournments spanning from 28.08.2025 to 09.03.2026, remained absent on the scheduled hearing date without any adjournment application, leading the court to conclude the complainant did not wish to proceed with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Industrial Court, Amravati dismissed the unfair labor practice complaint filed by Chanda Chhedilal Yadav against the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati in default on 12.03.2026. The complainant failed to present evidence despite multiple adjournments spanning from 28.08.2025 to 09.03.2026, remained absent on the scheduled hearing date without any adjournment application, leading the court to conclude the complainant did not wish to proceed with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts