Pradip Keshaorao Fartode vs Health Services Department, Mumbai and four others Advocate - U.S. Deshmukh — 20/2019

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHIC270000462019

Evidence

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

51/2019

Filing Date

16-03-2019

Registration No

20/2019

Registration Date

16-03-2019

Court

Industrial Court, Amravati

Judge

1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union And Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Pradip Keshaorao Fartode

Adv. S.B. Thakare

Respondent(s)

Health Services Department, Mumbai and four others Advocate - U.S. Deshmukh

The Joint Director, Health Dept., Pune

The Assistant Director, Health Services, Akola

The District Malaria Officer, Amravati

The Secrtary, Health Services, Mumbai

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.

06-03-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Evidence

10-12-2025

Evidence

29-10-2025

Evidence

26-09-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

24-04-2025
Order on Exhibit

The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) allowed the complainant Pradip Fartode's application for permission to conduct further examination-in-chief on 24.04.2025. The court granted this permission to enable the complainant to properly verify and prove documents on record, finding that denying such opportunity would be unfair and noting that no prejudice would result to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) allowed the complainant Pradip Fartode's application for permission to conduct further examination-in-chief on 24.04.2025. The court granted this permission to enable the complainant to properly verify and prove documents on record, finding that denying such opportunity would be unfair and noting that no prejudice would result to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Industrial Court, Amravati All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case