Dilip Vishnu Wankhade and another vs Health Services, Mumbai and four others Advocate - U.S. Deshmukh — 22/2022
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC270000412022
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
48/2022
Filing Date
04-03-2022
Registration No
22/2022
Registration Date
04-03-2022
Court
Industrial Court, Amravati
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dilip Vishnu Wankhade and another
Adv. S.B. Thakare
Respondent(s)
Health Services, Mumbai and four others Advocate - U.S. Deshmukh
The Joint Director, Health Services, Pune
The Assistant Director, Health Services, Akola
The District Malaria Officer, Amravati.
The Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 29-10-2025 | Evidence |
| 30-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) allowed the complainant Dilip Vishnu Wankhade's application and granted permission for further examination in chief on 15.04.2025. The court found that the initial examination lacked proper verification and the complainant had not been given adequate opportunity to verify and prove documents on record, necessitating this procedural allowance in the interest of fair trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) allowed the complainant Dilip Vishnu Wankhade's application and granted permission for further examination in chief on 15.04.2025. The court found that the initial examination lacked proper verification and the complainant had not been given adequate opportunity to verify and prove documents on record, necessitating this procedural allowance in the interest of fair trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts