Dilip Vishnu Wankhade and another vs Health Services, Mumbai and four others Advocate - U.S. Deshmukh — 22/2022
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC270000412022
Filing Number
48/2022
Filing Date
04-Mar-2022
Registration No
22/2022
Registration Date
04-Mar-2022
Court
Industrial Court, Amravati
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dilip Vishnu Wankhade and another
Adv. S.B. Thakare
Respondent(s)
-
1.Health Services, Mumbai and four others Advocate - U.S. Deshmukh
-
2.The Joint Director, Health Services, Pune
-
3.The Assistant Director, Health Services, Akola
-
4.The District Malaria Officer, Amravati.
-
5.The Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
15-Apr-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) allowed the complainant Dilip Vishnu Wankhade's application and granted permission for further examination in chief on 15.04.2025. The court found that the initial examination lacked proper verification and the complainant had not been given adequate opportunity to verify and prove documents on record, necessitating this procedural allowance in the interest of fair trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
08-Apr-2025
Hearing below Exh._______
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
02-Apr-2025
Hearing below Exh._______
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
18-Mar-2025
Hearing below Exh._______
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
14-Feb-2025
Hearing below Exh._______
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
05-Feb-2025
Hearing below Exh._______
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
21-Dec-2024
Hearing below Exh._______
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
16-Oct-2024
Hearing below Exh._______
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
18-Sep-2024
Say
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
14-Aug-2024
Argument
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
24-Jul-2024
Argument
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
09-Jul-2024
Argument
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
02-Jul-2024
Argument
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
20-Jun-2024
Argument
Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.
-
30-Mar-2024
Argument
Member Industrial Court
-
15-Mar-2024
Argument
Member Industrial Court
-
03-Mar-2024
Argument
Member Industrial Court
-
28-Feb-2024
Argument
Member Industrial Court
-
31-Jan-2024
Argument
Member Industrial Court
-
18-Dec-2023
Respondent Evidence
Member Industrial Court
-
28-Nov-2023
Respondent Evidence
Member Industrial Court
-
17-Oct-2023
Respondent Evidence
Member Industrial Court
-
29-Sep-2023
Evidence
Member Industrial Court
-
04-Sep-2023
Respondent Evidence
Member Industrial Court
-
22-Aug-2023
Evidence
Member Industrial Court
-
04-Jul-2023
Evidence
Member Industrial Court
-
21-Apr-2023
Documents Issues
Member Industrial Court
-
13-Mar-2023
Documents Issues
Member Industrial Court
-
12-Jan-2023
Documents Issues
Member Industrial Court
-
11-Nov-2022
Documents Issues
Member Industrial Court
-
17-Sep-2022
Documents Issues
Member Industrial Court
-
21-Jul-2022
Documents Issues
Member Industrial Court
-
09-Jun-2022
Reply
Member Industrial Court
-
16-Apr-2022
Reply
Member Industrial Court
-
04-Mar-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2022
Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) allowed the complainant Dilip Vishnu Wankhade's application and granted permission for further examination in chief on 15.04.2025. The court found that the initial examination lacked proper verification and the complainant had not been given adequate opportunity to verify and prove documents on record, necessitating this procedural allowance in the interest of fair trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts