Aninath Gorakh Pawar vs Chairman and Managing Director, R.R.B. Energy Ltd.Beed and 2 others Advocate - S.V.Dankh — 1700515/2015
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Cross. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200006262015
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
1701368/2015
Filing Date
15-12-2015
Registration No
1700515/2015
Registration Date
15-12-2015
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Aninath Gorakh Pawar
Adv. P.M.Shinde
Respondent(s)
Chairman and Managing Director, R.R.B. Energy Ltd.Beed and 2 others Advocate - S.V.Dankh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Cross
Cross
Cross
Cross
Cross
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Cross |
| 06-03-2026 | Cross |
| 17-02-2026 | Cross |
| 09-02-2026 | Cross |
| 31-01-2026 | Cross |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court at Aurangabad allowed the respondent's (RRB Energy Ltd.) application to amend its written statement in a ULP complaint filed by employee Ajinath Gorakh Pawar in 2015 regarding a disputed transfer order. The court granted the amendment to enable proper adjudication, finding that the respondent's subsequent factual changes (site closures and business losses) were material to the case, though it imposed Rs. 3,000 costs on the respondent and required submission of the amended statement within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court at Aurangabad allowed the respondent's (RRB Energy Ltd.) application to amend its written statement in a ULP complaint filed by employee Ajinath Gorakh Pawar in 2015 regarding a disputed transfer order. The court granted the amendment to enable proper adjudication, finding that the respondent's subsequent factual changes (site closures and business losses) were material to the case, though it imposed Rs. 3,000 costs on the respondent and required submission of the amended statement within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts