Sanjay Madhukar Kemkar vs Chairman and Managing Director, R.R.B. Energy Ltd.Beed and 2 others Advocate - S.V.Dankh — 1700505/2015
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28,30. Status: Cross. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200006162015
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
1701358/2015
Filing Date
15-12-2015
Registration No
1700505/2015
Registration Date
15-12-2015
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Madhukar Kemkar
Adv. P.M.Shinde
Respondent(s)
Chairman and Managing Director, R.R.B. Energy Ltd.Beed and 2 others Advocate - S.V.Dankh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Cross
Cross
Cross
Cross
Cross
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Cross |
| 06-03-2026 | Cross |
| 17-02-2026 | Cross |
| 09-02-2026 | Cross |
| 31-01-2026 | Cross |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court at Aurangabad allowed the respondent's (RRB Energy Ltd.) application to amend its written statement in an unfair labor practice complaint filed by security guard Sanjay Madhukar Kemkar concerning his 2015 transfer order. The court found the amendment necessary for proper adjudication despite the significant delay, but imposed costs of Rs. 3,000 upon the respondent payable to the complainant within 15 days, with a condition that failure to submit the amended written statement within the deadline would result in automatic recall of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court at Aurangabad allowed the respondent's (RRB Energy Ltd.) application to amend its written statement in an unfair labor practice complaint filed by security guard Sanjay Madhukar Kemkar concerning his 2015 transfer order. The court found the amendment necessary for proper adjudication despite the significant delay, but imposed costs of Rs. 3,000 upon the respondent payable to the complainant within 15 days, with a condition that failure to submit the amended written statement within the deadline would result in automatic recall of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts