Ankush Babu Bedre vs Chairman and Managing Director, R.R.B. Energy Ltd.Beed and 2 others Advocate - S.V.Dankh — 1700501/2015
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28,30. Status: Cross. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200006122015
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
1701354/2015
Filing Date
15-12-2015
Registration No
1700501/2015
Registration Date
15-12-2015
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ankush Babu Bedre
Adv. P.M.Shinde
Respondent(s)
Chairman and Managing Director, R.R.B. Energy Ltd.Beed and 2 others Advocate - S.V.Dankh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Cross
Cross
Cross
Cross
Cross
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Cross |
| 06-03-2026 | Cross |
| 17-02-2026 | Cross |
| 09-02-2026 | Cross |
| 31-01-2026 | Cross |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Court at Aurangabad allowed the respondent (RRB Energy Ltd.) to amend its written statement in an unfair labor practice complaint filed by employee Ankush Babu Bendre in 2015. The court found the amendment necessary for proper adjudication regarding the complainant's disputed transfer order of December 7, 2015, and permitted the respondent to incorporate additional facts about changed circumstances since then. However, the respondent was ordered to pay Rs. 3,000 in costs to the complainant within 15 days and submit the amended written statement on the next hearing date, failing which the order would be recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Court at Aurangabad allowed the respondent (RRB Energy Ltd.) to amend its written statement in an unfair labor practice complaint filed by employee Ankush Babu Bendre in 2015. The court found the amendment necessary for proper adjudication regarding the complainant's disputed transfer order of December 7, 2015, and permitted the respondent to incorporate additional facts about changed circumstances since then. However, the respondent was ordered to pay Rs. 3,000 in costs to the complainant within 15 days and submit the amended written statement on the next hearing date, failing which the order would be recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts