Ashok Sakharam Bedre vs Chairman and Managing Director, R.R.B. Energy Ltd.Beed and 2 others Advocate - S.V.Dankh — 1700496/2015
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28,30. Status: Cross. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200006072015
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
1701349/2015
Filing Date
15-12-2015
Registration No
1700496/2015
Registration Date
15-12-2015
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Sakharam Bedre
Adv. P.M.Shinde
Respondent(s)
Chairman and Managing Director, R.R.B. Energy Ltd.Beed and 2 others Advocate - S.V.Dankh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Cross
Cross
Cross
Cross
Cross
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Cross |
| 06-03-2026 | Cross |
| 17-02-2026 | Cross |
| 09-02-2026 | Cross |
| 31-01-2026 | Cross |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Industrial Court at Aurangabad allowed the respondent's (RRB Energy Ltd.) application to amend its written statement in this unfair labor practice complaint filed by Ashok Sakharam Bendre regarding his 2015 transfer order. The court found the amendment necessary for proper adjudication, though it imposed Rs. 3,000 costs on the respondent for filing the belated amendment application. The respondent must submit the amended written statement within 15 days or the order will be recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Industrial Court at Aurangabad allowed the respondent's (RRB Energy Ltd.) application to amend its written statement in this unfair labor practice complaint filed by Ashok Sakharam Bendre regarding his 2015 transfer order. The court found the amendment necessary for proper adjudication, though it imposed Rs. 3,000 costs on the respondent for filing the belated amendment application. The respondent must submit the amended written statement within 15 days or the order will be recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts