Suraj Appasaheb Joshi vs M/s D.B.Corp. Danik Bhaskar Group Through Directors and 2 others Advocate - A.B.Waikos — 20/2017

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: DID. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

COMPLAINT ULP

CNR: MHIC200005352016

DID

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

Filing Number

25/2017

Filing Date

09-01-2017

Registration No

20/2017

Registration Date

09-01-2017

Court

Industrial Court, Aurangabad

Judge

1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Suraj Appasaheb Joshi

Adv. G.S.Telangre

Respondent(s)

M/s D.B.Corp. Danik Bhaskar Group Through Directors and 2 others Advocate - A.B.Waikos

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.

06-03-2026

DID

06-02-2026

Evidence

07-01-2026

Evidence

02-12-2025

Order on Exh..... R

14-11-2025

Order on Exh..... R

Interim Orders

07-01-2026
Copy of Order Below Exhibit

Case Summary Order: Application Rejected The Industrial Court at Aurangabad rejected the complainant Suraj Apparao Joshi's amendment application filed in ULP No. 20/2017 against Dainik Bhaskar Group. The court found the amendment was filed beyond the limitation period (nearly six years after dismissal in 2018) and was unrelated to the original complaint seeking permanency, as the dismissal issue was already being separately litigated in pending Complaint ULP No. 40/2022 before the Labour Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Order: Application Rejected The Industrial Court at Aurangabad rejected the complainant Suraj Apparao Joshi's amendment application filed in ULP No. 20/2017 against Dainik Bhaskar Group. The court found the amendment was filed beyond the limitation period (nearly six years after dismissal in 2018) and was unrelated to the original complaint seeking permanency, as the dismissal issue was already being separately litigated in pending Complaint ULP No. 40/2022 before the Labour Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Industrial Court, Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case