Pitti Engineering Kamgar Sanghatana vs Pitti Engineering Ltd Advocate - B.R.Kawre — 99/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200003972025
e-Filing Number
02-12-2025
Filing Number
570/2025
Filing Date
03-Dec-2025
Registration No
99/2025
Registration Date
03-Dec-2025
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pitti Engineering Kamgar Sanghatana
Adv. T.K.Prabhakaran
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pitti Engineering Ltd Advocate - B.R.Kawre
Case History
-
07-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
14-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
06-Dec-2025
Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Industrial Court at Aurangabad passed an ad interim order on December 6, 2025, in a complaint by Pitti Engineering Kamgar Sanghatna against Pitti Engineering Ltd. regarding 14 employees' alleged work stoppage on November 12, 2025. The court directed the employees to submit their explanations to the show-cause notice issued by management, and prohibited the company from deducting eight days' wages until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Dec-2025
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
05-Dec-2025
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
04-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 99/2025
Summary: The Industrial Court at Aurangabad passed an ad interim order on December 6, 2025, in a complaint by Pitti Engineering Kamgar Sanghatna against Pitti Engineering Ltd. regarding 14 employees' alleged work stoppage on November 12, 2025. The court directed the employees to submit their explanations to the show-cause notice issued by management, and prohibited the company from deducting eight days' wages until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts