Tatyarao bapurao Fade vs The Chairman,Shri Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana ltd and othes 2 Advocate - P.M.Shinde — 98/2020
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200002402020
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
408/2020
Filing Date
22-10-2020
Registration No
98/2020
Registration Date
22-10-2020
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tatyarao bapurao Fade
Adv. R.R.Imale
Respondent(s)
The Chairman,Shri Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana ltd and othes 2 Advocate - P.M.Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 20-09-2025 | Evidence |
| 05-08-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad rejected the respondent's application (Exh. C-13) seeking to set aside an ex-parte order dated 18-03-2021. The court found the application unmaintainable as it was neither signed by the concerned parties nor supported by an affidavit, and noted the respondents had unreasonably delayed filing it for nearly 4 years despite being aware of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad rejected the respondent's application (Exh. C-13) seeking to set aside an ex-parte order dated 18-03-2021. The court found the application unmaintainable as it was neither signed by the concerned parties nor supported by an affidavit, and noted the respondents had unreasonably delayed filing it for nearly 4 years despite being aware of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts