Rajesh Babuganesh Jadhav vs City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Advocate - S B Mene — 159/2018
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200001452018
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
600/2018
Filing Date
01-10-2018
Registration No
159/2018
Registration Date
01-10-2018
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajesh Babuganesh Jadhav
Adv. B.R.Kawre
Respondent(s)
City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Advocate - S B Mene
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Argument
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument |
| 06-02-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
| 23-12-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
| 03-12-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
| 15-11-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad partly allowed the interim relief application filed by Rajesh Babuganesh Jadhav against CIDCO (City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.). The court directed the respondent not to terminate or discontinue the complainant's services until the final disposal of the unfair labour practices complaint. However, the court deferred the question of granting salary adjustments, pay-scale changes, and consequential benefits to the final hearing of the main complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad partly allowed the interim relief application filed by Rajesh Babuganesh Jadhav against CIDCO (City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.). The court directed the respondent not to terminate or discontinue the complainant's services until the final disposal of the unfair labour practices complaint. However, the court deferred the question of granting salary adjustments, pay-scale changes, and consequential benefits to the final hearing of the main complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts