Ravisingh Ramsingh Rathod vs City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Advocate - S B Mene — 158/2018
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200001442018
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
599/2018
Filing Date
01-10-2018
Registration No
158/2018
Registration Date
01-10-2018
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravisingh Ramsingh Rathod
Adv. B.R.Kawre
Respondent(s)
City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Advocate - S B Mene
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Argument
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument |
| 06-02-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
| 23-12-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
| 03-12-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
| 15-11-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Industrial Court at Aurangabad partly allowed an interim relief application filed by employee Ravisingh Ramsingh Rathod under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court found a prima facie case of unfair labour practices and directed the respondent (CIDCO) not to terminate or discontinue the complainant's services pending final disposal of the complaint, while deferring decisions on salary adjustments and consequential benefits to the final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Industrial Court at Aurangabad partly allowed an interim relief application filed by employee Ravisingh Ramsingh Rathod under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court found a prima facie case of unfair labour practices and directed the respondent (CIDCO) not to terminate or discontinue the complainant's services pending final disposal of the complaint, while deferring decisions on salary adjustments and consequential benefits to the final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts