Raju Murlidhar Tupe vs City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Advocate - S B Mene — 156/2018
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200001422018
Filing Number
597/2018
Filing Date
01-Oct-2018
Registration No
156/2018
Registration Date
01-Oct-2018
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raju Murlidhar Tupe
Adv. B.R.Kawre
Respondent(s)
-
1.City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Advocate - S B Mene
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Argument
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
06-Feb-2026
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Dec-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
03-Dec-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
15-Nov-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
13-Oct-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
18-Sep-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
10-Jul-2025
Cross
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
13-Nov-2024
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Sep-2024
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
20-Jun-2024
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
04-Apr-2024
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
05-Feb-2024
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
13-Dec-2023
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
12-Oct-2023
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
18-Jul-2023
Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad partly allowed the interim relief application filed by complainant Raju Murlidhar Tupe under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court directed the respondent (CIDCO) to not terminate or discontinue the complainant's services until the final decision of the complaint, finding a prima facie case of unfair labour practices and that balance of convenience favors protecting the employee's employment during the pendency of proceedings. Questions regarding salary, pay-scale, and consequential benefits are reserved for final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jul-2023
Document/Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
15-Jul-2023
Order on Exh..... R
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
10-Jul-2023
Order on Exh..... R
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Jun-2023
Order on Exh..... R
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
07-Jun-2023
Order on Exh..... R
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
27-Apr-2023
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
11-Apr-2023
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
09-Mar-2023
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
17-Dec-2022
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
10-Nov-2022
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
20-Sep-2022
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
18-Aug-2022
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
14-Jun-2022
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Mar-2022
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
18-Dec-2021
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
11-Nov-2021
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
20-Aug-2021
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
09-Apr-2021
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
24-Feb-2021
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
11-Dec-2020
Steps
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Sep-2020
Steps
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
06-Aug-2020
Steps
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
07-Apr-2020
Steps
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
12-Feb-2020
Steps
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
04-Jan-2020
Steps
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
22-Nov-2019
Order on Exh..... R
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
03-Oct-2019
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
29-Jul-2019
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
12-Jun-2019
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
22-Apr-2019
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
18-Mar-2019
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
25-Feb-2019
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
15-Jan-2019
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
21-Dec-2018
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
12-Dec-2018
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Nov-2018
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
29-Oct-2018
Appearance
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
03-Oct-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Oct-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 156/2018
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad partly allowed the interim relief application filed by complainant Raju Murlidhar Tupe under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court directed the respondent (CIDCO) to not terminate or discontinue the complainant's services until the final decision of the complaint, finding a prima facie case of unfair labour practices and that balance of convenience favors protecting the employee's employment during the pendency of proceedings. Questions regarding salary, pay-scale, and consequential benefits are reserved for final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts