Milind Abasaheb Pathare vs City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Advocate - S B Mene — 155/2018
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200001412018
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
596/2018
Filing Date
01-10-2018
Registration No
155/2018
Registration Date
01-10-2018
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Milind Abasaheb Pathare
Adv. B.R.Kawre
Respondent(s)
City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Advocate - S B Mene
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Argument
Argument
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument |
| 06-02-2026 | Argument |
| 23-12-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
| 03-12-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
| 15-11-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad partly allowed the interim relief application filed by employee Shri Milind Abasaheb Pathare under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions Act, 1971. The court directed CIDCO (City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.) not to terminate or discontinue the complainant's services pending final disposal of the unfair labour practices complaint. The court found a prima facie case of unfair labour practices and determined that balance of convenience favored protecting the employee's services, with questions regarding salary adjustments and consequential benefits to be decided during final determination of the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad partly allowed the interim relief application filed by employee Shri Milind Abasaheb Pathare under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions Act, 1971. The court directed CIDCO (City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.) not to terminate or discontinue the complainant's services pending final disposal of the unfair labour practices complaint. The court found a prima facie case of unfair labour practices and determined that balance of convenience favored protecting the employee's services, with questions regarding salary adjustments and consequential benefits to be decided during final determination of the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts