Milind Abasaheb Pathare vs City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Advocate - S B Mene — 155/2018
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200001412018
Filing Number
596/2018
Filing Date
01-Oct-2018
Registration No
155/2018
Registration Date
01-Oct-2018
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Milind Abasaheb Pathare
Adv. B.R.Kawre
Respondent(s)
-
1.City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Advocate - S B Mene
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Argument
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
06-Feb-2026
Argument
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Dec-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
03-Dec-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
15-Nov-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
13-Oct-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
18-Sep-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
10-Jul-2025
Cross
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
13-Nov-2024
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Sep-2024
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
20-Jun-2024
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
04-Apr-2024
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
05-Feb-2024
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
13-Dec-2023
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
12-Oct-2023
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
18-Jul-2023
Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad partly allowed the interim relief application filed by employee Shri Milind Abasaheb Pathare under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions Act, 1971. The court directed CIDCO (City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.) not to terminate or discontinue the complainant's services pending final disposal of the unfair labour practices complaint. The court found a prima facie case of unfair labour practices and determined that balance of convenience favored protecting the employee's services, with questions regarding salary adjustments and consequential benefits to be decided during final determination of the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jul-2023
Document/Issues
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
15-Jul-2023
Order on Exh..... R
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
10-Jul-2023
Order on Exh..... R
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Jun-2023
Order on Exh..... R
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
07-Jun-2023
Order on Exh..... R
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
27-Apr-2023
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
11-Apr-2023
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
09-Mar-2023
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
17-Dec-2022
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
10-Nov-2022
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
20-Sep-2022
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
18-Aug-2022
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
14-Jun-2022
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Mar-2022
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
18-Dec-2021
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
11-Nov-2021
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
20-Aug-2021
Argument Below Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
09-Apr-2021
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
24-Feb-2021
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
11-Dec-2020
Steps
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Sep-2020
Steps
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
06-Aug-2020
Steps
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
07-Apr-2020
Steps
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
12-Feb-2020
Steps
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
04-Jan-2020
Steps
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
22-Nov-2019
Order on Exh..... R
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
03-Oct-2019
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
29-Jul-2019
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
12-Jun-2019
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
22-Apr-2019
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
18-Mar-2019
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
25-Feb-2019
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
15-Jan-2019
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
21-Dec-2018
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
12-Dec-2018
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Nov-2018
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
29-Oct-2018
Filing of Say on Exh.
Member, Industrial Court, Aurangabad.
-
03-Oct-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Oct-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 155/2018
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad partly allowed the interim relief application filed by employee Shri Milind Abasaheb Pathare under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions Act, 1971. The court directed CIDCO (City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.) not to terminate or discontinue the complainant's services pending final disposal of the unfair labour practices complaint. The court found a prima facie case of unfair labour practices and determined that balance of convenience favored protecting the employee's services, with questions regarding salary adjustments and consequential benefits to be decided during final determination of the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts