Bhimrao Shamrao Ahire vs M/s Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Advocate - A.B.Katkar — 95/2018
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 26,28. Status: Cross. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200000412018
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
418/2018
Filing Date
29-06-2018
Registration No
95/2018
Registration Date
29-06-2018
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhimrao Shamrao Ahire
Adv. R.B.Gade
Respondent(s)
M/s Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Advocate - A.B.Katkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Cross
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Cross |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad rejected the complainant's application (ULP No. 95-2018) seeking direction to the respondent to produce attendance sheets, payment slips, and Provident Fund documents. The court found the application unmaintainable due to lack of supporting affidavit, vague pleadings without specified time periods, and over five years delay in filing (retired 2013, complaint filed 2018). The court upheld the respondent's objections as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad rejected the complainant's application (ULP No. 95-2018) seeking direction to the respondent to produce attendance sheets, payment slips, and Provident Fund documents. The court found the application unmaintainable due to lack of supporting affidavit, vague pleadings without specified time periods, and over five years delay in filing (retired 2013, complaint filed 2018). The court upheld the respondent's objections as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts