Jagannath Masaji Bansode vs Solapur Mahanagar Palika Solapur And Anr Advocate - Kalekar S.S. — 179/2018

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Complaint ULP1

CNR: MHIC130003262018

Argument

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

Filing Number

179/2018

Filing Date

20-10-2018

Registration No

179/2018

Registration Date

20-10-2018

Court

Industrial Court, Solapur

Judge

1-Member, Industrial Court, Solapur

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union And Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Jagannath Masaji Bansode

Adv. Jadhav B.T.

Respondent(s)

Solapur Mahanagar Palika Solapur And Anr Advocate - Kalekar S.S.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Solapur

24-03-2026

Argument

06-03-2026

Additional Evidence

26-02-2026

Respondent Evidence

21-01-2026

Respondent Evidence

19-01-2026

Respondent Evidence

Interim Orders

28-02-2023
Copy of Decree
20-09-2024
Copy of Decree
07-08-2025
Copy of Decree
16-10-2025
Copy of Decree
16-10-2025
Copy of Decree

Summary: In Industrial Court case ULP No. 179/2018 (Solapur), the court examined witness testimony regarding alleged misconduct by municipal officials on July 10, 2013. The witness, a municipal employee, testified that he signed a panchnama (official document) without being informed of its contents. The court found the cross-examination complete and no further cross-examination was required by the complainant's counsel. The petition was ultimately dismissed with no relief granted to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Industrial Court case ULP No. 179/2018 (Solapur), the court examined witness testimony regarding alleged misconduct by municipal officials on July 10, 2013. The witness, a municipal employee, testified that he signed a panchnama (official document) without being informed of its contents. The court found the cross-examination complete and no further cross-examination was required by the complainant's counsel. The petition was ultimately dismissed with no relief granted to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Industrial Court, Solapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case