Kausar Babumiya Shaikh- L.H.R. Gausiya Begam Shaikh vs Solapur Muncipal Transport Undertaking Advocate - S H Kokare — 15/2020
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC130000302020
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
32/2020
Filing Date
03-03-2020
Registration No
15/2020
Registration Date
03-03-2020
Court
Industrial Court, Solapur
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kausar Babumiya Shaikh- L.H.R. Gausiya Begam Shaikh
Adv. Deshpande V.R.
Respondent(s)
Solapur Muncipal Transport Undertaking Advocate - S H Kokare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
Argument
Argument
Argument
Respondent Evidence
Additional Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument |
| 29-01-2026 | Argument |
| 02-01-2026 | Argument |
| 29-11-2025 | Respondent Evidence |
| 10-11-2025 | Additional Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is an affidavit (Complaint ULP No. 15/2020) heard by the Industrial Court, Solapur. The court dismissed the complaint in full ("उलटतपाशणी पूर्ण" - complaint completely rejected). The affiant (widow claiming service benefits for her deceased husband Kausar Shaikh) withdrew and admitted her statements were false regarding the deceased's continuous 30-year service from 1988-2018; the court found the complaint was based on incorrect information and the demands made were unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is an affidavit (Complaint ULP No. 15/2020) heard by the Industrial Court, Solapur. The court dismissed the complaint in full ("उलटतपाशणी पूर्ण" - complaint completely rejected). The affiant (widow claiming service benefits for her deceased husband Kausar Shaikh) withdrew and admitted her statements were false regarding the deceased's continuous 30-year service from 1988-2018; the court found the complaint was based on incorrect information and the demands made were unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts