Jubiliant Kamgar Union vs Jubiliant Ingrevin Ltd Advocate - A. R. Joshi — 239/2021
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Argument On Exh___. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
Complaint ULP I
CNR: MHIC120004622021
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
Filing Number
461/2021
Filing Date
24-11-2021
Registration No
239/2021
Registration Date
24-11-2021
Court
Industrial Court, Pune
Judge
2-MEMBER, 2nd INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jubiliant Kamgar Union
Adv. Aniruddha Sanap
Respondent(s)
Jubiliant Ingrevin Ltd Advocate - A. R. Joshi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, 2nd INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Argument On Exh___
Argument On Exh___
Argument On Exh___
Argument On Exh___
Argument On Exh___
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Argument On Exh___ |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument On Exh___ |
| 27-02-2026 | Argument On Exh___ |
| 22-01-2026 | Argument On Exh___ |
| 06-11-2025 | Argument On Exh___ |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court Pune rejected the complainant's application (Exhibit U-35) seeking to continue an ad-interim order that had previously stayed union election results. The court found that the complainant failed to establish a strong prima-facie case of unfair labour practices and that the original interim order was passed only due to time constraints, not on merit. With the election voting process already completed, the court determined there was no basis to maintain the stay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court Pune rejected the complainant's application (Exhibit U-35) seeking to continue an ad-interim order that had previously stayed union election results. The court found that the complainant failed to establish a strong prima-facie case of unfair labour practices and that the original interim order was passed only due to time constraints, not on merit. With the election voting process already completed, the court determined there was no basis to maintain the stay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts