Pravin Namdeo Gogawale vs Emuge-Franken India Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - Ajay V. kadam — 40/2023

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A. Status: Argument Prelimanary Issues. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Argument Prelimanary Issues Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Reference IT

CNR: MHIC120004402023

Filing Number

440/2023

Filing Date

02-Nov-2023

Registration No

40/2023

Registration Date

02-Nov-2023

Court

Industrial Court, Pune

Judge

2-Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pravin Namdeo Gogawale

    Adv. D. B. Sharmale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Emuge-Franken India Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - Ajay V. kadam

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument Prelimanary Issues

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  3. 29-Jan-2026

    Argument Prelimanary Issues

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  4. 22-Dec-2025

    Argument Prelimanary Issues

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    Order Below Exb.View PDF

    Summary: The Industrial Tribunal at Pune allowed the employer's application to discard the workman's affidavit filed as examination-in-chief. The Tribunal held that preliminary issues 2 and 3 regarding the dismissal inquiry must be decided solely on the basis of the original inquiry record and proceedings, not fresh evidence. The parties are now directed to advance arguments on the preliminary issues, with the workman's right to present evidence on remaining issues reserved for later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Argument Prelimanary Issues

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Order Below Exh___

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  8. 31-Oct-2025

    Argument On Exh___

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  9. 16-Oct-2025

    Argument On Exh___

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Argument On Exh___

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  11. 05-Aug-2025

    Argument On Exh___

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  12. 24-Jul-2025

    Say on Exhibit

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  13. 17-Jul-2025

    Say on Exhibit

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  14. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence of Fist Party

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  15. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence of Fist Party

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  16. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence of Fist Party

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  17. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence of Fist Party

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  18. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence of Fist Party

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  19. 18-Dec-2024

    Evidence of Fist Party

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  20. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence of Fist Party

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  21. 11-Oct-2024

    Evidence of Fist Party

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  22. 12-Sep-2024

    Evidence of Fist Party

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  23. 08-Aug-2024

    Argument On Exh___

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  24. 12-Jul-2024

    Argument On Exh___

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  25. 21-Jun-2024

    Say on Exhibit

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  26. 08-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  27. 14-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  28. 01-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  29. 21-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  30. 03-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 02-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 40/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Tribunal at Pune allowed the employer's application to discard the workman's affidavit filed as examination-in-chief. The Tribunal held that preliminary issues 2 and 3 regarding the dismissal inquiry must be decided solely on the basis of the original inquiry record and proceedings, not fresh evidence. The parties are now directed to advance arguments on the preliminary issues, with the workman's right to present evidence on remaining issues reserved for later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case