Varad Enterprises vs Employees State Insurance Corporation Advocate - Aaditya K. Rananaware — 47/2021
Case under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75. Status: Amnesty Scheme. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
Application ESI - Applicaton ESI
CNR: MHIC120004092021
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
Filing Number
408/2021
Filing Date
21-10-2021
Registration No
47/2021
Registration Date
21-10-2021
Court
Industrial Court, Pune
Judge
1-MEMBER, 1st INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Varad Enterprises
Adv. J. V. Kulkarni
Respondent(s)
Employees State Insurance Corporation Advocate - Aaditya K. Rananaware
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, 1st INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Amnesty Scheme
Argument On Exh___
Cross Of Applicant
Mediation Report
Mediation Report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Amnesty Scheme |
| 12-02-2026 | Argument On Exh___ |
| 18-11-2025 | Cross Of Applicant |
| 30-09-2025 | Mediation Report |
| 19-09-2025 | Mediation Report |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Application ESI NO. 47/2021 — Varad Enterprises v. Employees State Insurance Corporation The Insurance Court at Pune allowed the main application and stayed the execution of the ESI Corporation's Section 45A order (dated 31.08.2020) demanding Rs. 1,57,808 in contributions, pending final decision. The applicant successfully satisfied the mandatory 50% deposit requirement under Section 75(2-B) of the ESI Act by depositing Rs. 1,15,904, making it maintainable. A waiver petition was rejected as no longer necessary given the deposit made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Application ESI NO. 47/2021 — Varad Enterprises v. Employees State Insurance Corporation The Insurance Court at Pune allowed the main application and stayed the execution of the ESI Corporation's Section 45A order (dated 31.08.2020) demanding Rs. 1,57,808 in contributions, pending final decision. The applicant successfully satisfied the mandatory 50% deposit requirement under Section 75(2-B) of the ESI Act by depositing Rs. 1,15,904, making it maintainable. A waiver petition was rejected as no longer necessary given the deposit made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts