Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh vs M/s Exide Industries ltd Advocate - A. K. Gupte — 91/2022
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28, 26. Status: Say on Exhibit. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
Complaint ULP I
CNR: MHIC120003512022
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
350/2022
Filing Date
29-06-2022
Registration No
91/2022
Registration Date
29-06-2022
Court
Industrial Court, Pune
Judge
2-MEMBER, 2nd INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh
Adv. Nitin B.Patil.
Ravindra M. Dode
Adv. S. T. Mhaske
Respondent(s)
M/s Exide Industries ltd Advocate - A. K. Gupte
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, 2nd INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Say on Exhibit
Evidence of Complainant
Evidence of Complainant
Evidence of Complainant
Evidence of Complainant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Say on Exhibit |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence of Complainant |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence of Complainant |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence of Complainant |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence of Complainant |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The Industrial Court, Pune rejected an interim relief application filed by a trade union on behalf of six employees of Exide Industries Ltd., who challenged their transfer orders dated 27/06/2022 to the company's Bawal, Haryana plant. The court found that the complainants failed to establish a strong prima facie case of unfair labour practices, noting that the transfer decision was discussed with the existing Maharashtra Labour Union as early as June 2021—well before the complainant union's formation in May 2022. The court held that the transfers were made for genuine business exigencies (supply needs of major customers in North India) and did not breach service conditions, as transfer was an explicit clause in the employment contracts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The Industrial Court, Pune rejected an interim relief application filed by a trade union on behalf of six employees of Exide Industries Ltd., who challenged their transfer orders dated 27/06/2022 to the company's Bawal, Haryana plant. The court found that the complainants failed to establish a strong prima facie case of unfair labour practices, noting that the transfer decision was discussed with the existing Maharashtra Labour Union as early as June 2021—well before the complainant union's formation in May 2022. The court held that the transfers were made for genuine business exigencies (supply needs of major customers in North India) and did not breach service conditions, as transfer was an explicit clause in the employment contracts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts