Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh vs M/s Exide Industries ltd Advocate - A. K. Gupte — 91/2022

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28, 26. Status: Say on Exhibit. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Say on Exhibit Next hearing 06-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Complaint ULP I

CNR: MHIC120003512022

Filing Number

350/2022

Filing Date

29-Jun-2022

Registration No

91/2022

Registration Date

29-Jun-2022

Court

Industrial Court, Pune

Judge

2-Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28, 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh

    Adv. Nitin B.Patil.

  2. 2.Ravindra M. Dode

    Adv. S. T. Mhaske

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s Exide Industries ltd Advocate - A. K. Gupte

Case History

  1. 06-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Say on Exhibit

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  9. 26-Sep-2025

    Mediation Report

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  10. 01-Aug-2025

    Mediation Report

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  11. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  12. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  13. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  14. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  15. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  16. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  17. 18-Oct-2024

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  18. 06-Sep-2024

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  19. 26-Jul-2024

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  20. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence of Complainant

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  21. 05-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  22. 01-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  23. 19-Jan-2024

    Document

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  24. 24-Nov-2023

    Document

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  25. 15-Sep-2023

    Document

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  26. 04-Aug-2023

    Document

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  27. 09-Jun-2023

    Document

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  28. 29-Mar-2023

    Document

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  29. 21-Feb-2023

    Document

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  30. 05-Jan-2023

    Document

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  31. 01-Nov-2022

    Order Below Exb.View PDF

    SUMMARY The Industrial Court, Pune rejected an interim relief application filed by a trade union on behalf of six employees of Exide Industries Ltd., who challenged their transfer orders dated 27/06/2022 to the company's Bawal, Haryana plant. The court found that the complainants failed to establish a strong prima facie case of unfair labour practices, noting that the transfer decision was discussed with the existing Maharashtra Labour Union as early as June 2021—well before the complainant union's formation in May 2022. The court held that the transfers were made for genuine business exigencies (supply needs of major customers in North India) and did not breach service conditions, as transfer was an explicit clause in the employment contracts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  32. 01-Nov-2022

    Document

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  33. 17-Oct-2022

    Order on Interim Relief

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  34. 03-Oct-2022

    Order on Interim Relief

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  35. 27-Sep-2022

    Order on Interim Relief

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  36. 14-Sep-2022

    Order on Interim Relief

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  37. 01-Sep-2022

    Argument On Interim Relief

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  38. 18-Aug-2022

    Argument On Interim Relief

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  39. 02-Aug-2022

    Argument On Interim Relief

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  40. 26-Jul-2022

    Argument On Interim Relief

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  41. 14-Jul-2022

    Argument On Interim Relief

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  42. 29-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 29-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 91/2022

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Industrial Court, Pune rejected an interim relief application filed by a trade union on behalf of six employees of Exide Industries Ltd., who challenged their transfer orders dated 27/06/2022 to the company's Bawal, Haryana plant. The court found that the complainants failed to establish a strong prima facie case of unfair labour practices, noting that the transfer decision was discussed with the existing Maharashtra Labour Union as early as June 2021—well before the complainant union's formation in May 2022. The court held that the transfers were made for genuine business exigencies (supply needs of major customers in North India) and did not breach service conditions, as transfer was an explicit clause in the employment contracts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case