Hind Kamgar Sanghatna vs L. G. Electronics I. Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - A. R. Joshi — 64/2020

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Cross Examination of Complainant. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

Complaint ULP I

CNR: MHIC120001922020

Cross Examination of Complainant

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

192/2020

Filing Date

18-03-2020

Registration No

64/2020

Registration Date

18-03-2020

Court

Industrial Court, Pune

Judge

2-MEMBER, 2nd INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union And Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Hind Kamgar Sanghatna

Adv. Atul Dixit

Respondent(s)

L. G. Electronics I. Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - A. R. Joshi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-MEMBER, 2nd INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.

06-03-2026

Cross Examination of Complainant

24-02-2026

Cross Examination of Complainant

22-01-2026

Cross Examination of Complainant

22-12-2025

Cross Examination of Complainant

08-12-2025

Evidence of Complainant

Interim Orders

17-09-2025
Order Below Exb.

The Industrial Court at Pune rejected L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd.'s application seeking to frame preliminary issues of "workman" status and maintainability, finding no substance in the respondent's arguments that the complainants fall outside the definition of "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court ordered that all issues be tried together and directed the complaint to proceed further, citing the case's pending status since 2020 and settled legal precedent that preliminary and substantive issues should be consolidated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Industrial Court at Pune rejected L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd.'s application seeking to frame preliminary issues of "workman" status and maintainability, finding no substance in the respondent's arguments that the complainants fall outside the definition of "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court ordered that all issues be tried together and directed the complaint to proceed further, citing the case's pending status since 2020 and settled legal precedent that preliminary and substantive issues should be consolidated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Industrial Court, Pune All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case