Hind Kamgar Sanghatana vs M/s Ranvik Auto Components pvt. ltd. and ors. Advocate - A. K. Gupte — 38/2021
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Evidence of Complainant. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
Complaint ULP I
CNR: MHIC120000922021
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
Filing Number
92/2021
Filing Date
20-03-2021
Registration No
38/2021
Registration Date
20-03-2021
Court
Industrial Court, Pune
Judge
2-MEMBER, 2nd INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hind Kamgar Sanghatana
Adv. J. R. Paware
Respondent(s)
M/s Ranvik Auto Components pvt. ltd. and ors. Advocate - A. K. Gupte
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, 2nd INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Evidence of Complainant
Evidence of Complainant
Evidence of Complainant
Evidence of Complainant
Evidence of Complainant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence of Complainant |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence of Complainant |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence of Complainant |
| 27-11-2025 | Evidence of Complainant |
| 16-10-2025 | Evidence of Complainant |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court, Pune disposed of the interim relief application by referencing an earlier order in connected complaint ULP No. 323 of 2019, where a restraining order had already been granted preventing the respondent company from alienating its property. The court found that the trade union established a prima facie case of unfair labour practices by the company's failure to implement Labour Court awards directing reinstatement of workers with back wages from 27/01/2019 to 13/07/2020, and therefore no separate similar relief was required in this complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court, Pune disposed of the interim relief application by referencing an earlier order in connected complaint ULP No. 323 of 2019, where a restraining order had already been granted preventing the respondent company from alienating its property. The court found that the trade union established a prima facie case of unfair labour practices by the company's failure to implement Labour Court awards directing reinstatement of workers with back wages from 27/01/2019 to 13/07/2020, and therefore no separate similar relief was required in this complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts