M/s Mayur Maruti Mangalwedekar vs Employees State Insurance Corporation and ors. Advocate - S. V. Bobade — 17/2023
Case under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75. Status: Cross Of Applicant. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
Application ESI - Applicaton ESI
CNR: MHIC120000822023
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
Filing Number
82/2023
Filing Date
22-02-2023
Registration No
17/2023
Registration Date
22-02-2023
Court
Industrial Court, Pune
Judge
1-MEMBER, 1st INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s Mayur Maruti Mangalwedekar
Adv. V. S. Raje
Respondent(s)
Employees State Insurance Corporation and ors. Advocate - S. V. Bobade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, 1st INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Cross Of Applicant
Cross Of Applicant
Cross Of Applicant
Cross Of Applicant
Cross Of Applicant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Of Applicant |
| 09-01-2026 | Cross Of Applicant |
| 24-11-2025 | Cross Of Applicant |
| 13-10-2025 | Cross Of Applicant |
| 15-09-2025 | Cross Of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Insurance Court at Pune partially allowed the application filed by M/s Mayur Maruti Mangalwedekar against the Employees State Insurance Corporation. The court allowed the interim relief application, stayed the execution of the Section 45A order dated 3.2.2022 and prohibitory notice dated 25.7.2022, and directed ESI to release the applicant's frozen bank account, since the applicant had already deposited over 50% of the claimed amount as required under Section 75(2B) of the ESI Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Insurance Court at Pune partially allowed the application filed by M/s Mayur Maruti Mangalwedekar against the Employees State Insurance Corporation. The court allowed the interim relief application, stayed the execution of the Section 45A order dated 3.2.2022 and prohibitory notice dated 25.7.2022, and directed ESI to release the applicant's frozen bank account, since the applicant had already deposited over 50% of the claimed amount as required under Section 75(2B) of the ESI Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts