M/s A lion Services c/o Jaydeep Shivaji Chaudhari vs Karmachari Rajya Bima Nigam Advocate - S. J. Gogawale — 16/2023
Case under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75. Status: Cross Of Applicant. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Application ESI - Applicaton ESI
CNR: MHIC120000742023
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
74/2023
Filing Date
17-02-2023
Registration No
16/2023
Registration Date
17-02-2023
Court
Industrial Court, Pune
Judge
1-MEMBER, 1st INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s A lion Services c/o Jaydeep Shivaji Chaudhari
Adv. G. S. Gunte
Respondent(s)
Karmachari Rajya Bima Nigam Advocate - S. J. Gogawale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, 1st INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Cross Of Applicant
Cross Of Applicant
Cross Of Applicant
Cross Of Applicant
Cross Of Applicant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Of Applicant |
| 12-02-2026 | Cross Of Applicant |
| 29-01-2026 | Cross Of Applicant |
| 11-12-2025 | Cross Of Applicant |
| 17-11-2025 | Cross Of Applicant |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Insurance Court at Pune allowed Application C-2 and rejected Application C-3 filed by M/s A Lion Services against Karmachari Rajya Bima Nigam. The court stayed the execution of the Section 45A ESI order dated 21.12.2020 (for Rs. 7,19,235) and the prohibitory notice dated 12.1.2023 till final decision of the main application, finding that the applicant had already deposited more than 50% of the claimed amount, thereby satisfying the statutory requirement under Section 75(2B) of the ESI Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Insurance Court at Pune allowed Application C-2 and rejected Application C-3 filed by M/s A Lion Services against Karmachari Rajya Bima Nigam. The court stayed the execution of the Section 45A ESI order dated 21.12.2020 (for Rs. 7,19,235) and the prohibitory notice dated 12.1.2023 till final decision of the main application, finding that the applicant had already deposited more than 50% of the claimed amount, thereby satisfying the statutory requirement under Section 75(2B) of the ESI Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts