Towral India Pvt. ltd. vs Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh Advocate - Nitin Bhavar Patil — 11/2023
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2k. Status: Argument On Exh___. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Reference IT
CNR: MHIC120000572023
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
57/2023
Filing Date
06-02-2023
Registration No
11/2023
Registration Date
06-02-2023
Court
Industrial Court, Pune
Judge
1-MEMBER, 1st INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Towral India Pvt. ltd.
Adv. A. R. Joshi
Respondent(s)
Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh Advocate - Nitin Bhavar Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, 1st INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Argument On Exh___
Argument On Exh___
Argument On Exh___
Argument On Exh___
Argument On Exh___
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument On Exh___ |
| 16-01-2026 | Argument On Exh___ |
| 13-01-2026 | Argument On Exh___ |
| 09-01-2026 | Argument On Exh___ |
| 19-12-2025 | Argument On Exh___ |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY The Industrial Court, Maharashtra rejected an application filed by Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh (a registered trade union) seeking to be added as a party to an industrial dispute proceeding between M/s. Taural India Pvt. Ltd. and the union. The court found that the union failed to prima facie establish that its presence was necessary to decide the actual controversy between the original parties, and ruled that Section 36 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 does not provide for intervention by third-party unions in such proceedings. The application was dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY The Industrial Court, Maharashtra rejected an application filed by Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh (a registered trade union) seeking to be added as a party to an industrial dispute proceeding between M/s. Taural India Pvt. Ltd. and the union. The court found that the union failed to prima facie establish that its presence was necessary to decide the actual controversy between the original parties, and ruled that Section 36 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 does not provide for intervention by third-party unions in such proceedings. The application was dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts