Japfa Comfeed India Pvt. Ltd. vs Kashinath Jadhav Advocate - V. H. Shekdar — 9/2024

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 44. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Revn. Appln. ULP

CNR: MHIC120000502024

Filing Number

50/2024

Filing Date

16-Jan-2024

Registration No

9/2024

Registration Date

29-Jan-2024

Court

Industrial Court, Pune

Judge

2-Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 44

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Japfa Comfeed India Pvt. Ltd.

    Adv. V.S. Dhamankar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kashinath Jadhav Advocate - V. H. Shekdar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Industrial Court of Maharashtra rejected Japfa Comfeed India Pvt. Ltd.'s revision application challenging the Labour Court's order that stayed the dismissal of Kashinath Jadhav, a Senior Executive (Breeding), pending determination of whether he qualified as a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act. The Court found the Labour Court's interim relief order reasonable, as there was prima facie evidence that the employee lacked adequate opportunity to defend himself in the departmental enquiry (notices were returned unserved, documents were not provided), and directed the Labour Court to expedite the preliminary issue hearing within six months without prejudgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Judgment

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Judgment

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Judgment

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    Judgment

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  10. 03-Nov-2025

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  12. 23-Sep-2025

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  13. 16-Sep-2025

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  14. 25-Jul-2025

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  15. 24-Jun-2025

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  16. 15-Apr-2025

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  17. 01-Apr-2025

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  18. 19-Mar-2025

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  19. 03-Mar-2025

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  20. 22-Jan-2025

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  21. 07-Dec-2024

    R and P call

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  22. 16-Nov-2024

    R and P call

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  23. 16-Oct-2024

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  24. 30-Sep-2024

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  25. 29-Aug-2024

    Order Below Exb.View PDF

  26. 29-Aug-2024

    Argument

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  27. 19-Aug-2024

    Order Below Exh___

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  28. 22-Jul-2024

    Apperance

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  29. 11-Jun-2024

    Apperance

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  30. 06-Apr-2024

    Apperance

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  31. 01-Mar-2024

    Apperance

    Member, 2nd Industrial Court, Pune.

  32. 30-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 16-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Industrial Court of Maharashtra rejected Japfa Comfeed India Pvt. Ltd.'s revision application challenging the Labour Court's order that stayed the dismissal of Kashinath Jadhav, a Senior Executive (Breeding), pending determination of whether he qualified as a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act. The Court found the Labour Court's interim relief order reasonable, as there was prima facie evidence that the employee lacked adequate opportunity to defend himself in the departmental enquiry (notices were returned unserved, documents were not provided), and directed the Labour Court to expedite the preliminary issue hearing within six months without prejudgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case