Japfa Comfeed India Pvt. Ltd. vs Kashinath Jadhav Advocate - V. H. Shekdar — 9/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 44. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 06th March 2026.
Revn. Appln. ULP
CNR: MHIC120000502024
Filing Number
50/2024
Filing Date
16-01-2024
Registration No
9/2024
Registration Date
29-01-2024
Court
Industrial Court, Pune
Judge
2-MEMBER, 2nd INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Japfa Comfeed India Pvt. Ltd.
Adv. V.S. Dhamankar
Respondent(s)
Kashinath Jadhav Advocate - V. H. Shekdar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, 2nd INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 13-02-2026 | Judgment |
| 23-01-2026 | Judgment |
| 24-12-2025 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Industrial Court of Maharashtra rejected Japfa Comfeed India Pvt. Ltd.'s revision application challenging the Labour Court's order that stayed the dismissal of Kashinath Jadhav, a Senior Executive (Breeding), pending determination of whether he qualified as a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act. The Court found the Labour Court's interim relief order reasonable, as there was prima facie evidence that the employee lacked adequate opportunity to defend himself in the departmental enquiry (notices were returned unserved, documents were not provided), and directed the Labour Court to expedite the preliminary issue hearing within six months without prejudgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court of Maharashtra rejected Japfa Comfeed India Pvt. Ltd.'s revision application challenging the Labour Court's order that stayed the dismissal of Kashinath Jadhav, a Senior Executive (Breeding), pending determination of whether he qualified as a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act. The Court found the Labour Court's interim relief order reasonable, as there was prima facie evidence that the employee lacked adequate opportunity to defend himself in the departmental enquiry (notices were returned unserved, documents were not provided), and directed the Labour Court to expedite the preliminary issue hearing within six months without prejudgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts